Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.
CVE-2025-66564
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (36th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 36th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
December 4, 2025
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 8, 2026Excessive memory allocation during request parsing · Advisory · sigstore/timestamp-authority · GitHub
https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/security/advisories/GHSA-4qg8-fj49-pxjhcommit 0cae34e197d6 (sigstore/timestamp-authority)
Fix landed in sigstore/timestamp-authority commit 0cae34e197d6 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/commit/0cae34e197d685a14904e0bad135b89d13b69421Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-66564(10)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:3827Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines Release 1.20.3
- RHSA-2026:3825Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines Release 1.20.3
- RHSA-2026:3712Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines Release 1.15.4
- RHSA-2026:3710Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Pipelines Release 1.15.3
- RHSA-2026:3087Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHTAS 1.3.2 - Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer Release
- RHSA-2026:2852Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Security Profiles Operator bug fix and enhancement update
- RHSA-2026:2568Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHACS 4.9.3 security and bug fix update
- RHSA-2026:2350Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHACS 4.9.3 security and bug fix update
- +2 more
Patch Availability(9)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-chains-controller-rhel9:1771374749 | 2026-03-05 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-serve-tkn-cli-rhel9:1772679439 | 2026-03-05 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-pipelines/pipelines-chains-controller-rhel8:1772093872 | 2026-03-04 | redhat |
| redhat | rhtas/rhtas-console-rhel9:1771324865 | 2026-02-23 | redhat |
| redhat | compliance/openshift-security-profiles-rhel8-operator:1770869850 | 2026-02-17 | redhat |
| redhat | advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-rhel8-operator:1770074713 | 2026-02-11 | redhat |
| redhat | advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-rhel8-operator:1770250889 | 2026-02-09 | redhat |
| redhat | rhtas/timestamp-authority-rhel9:1770107440 | 2026-02-05 | redhat |
| redhat | advanced-cluster-security/rhacs-main-rhel8:1769615659 | 2026-01-28 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Go(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority | — |
| — |
| github.com/sigstore/timestamp-authority/v2 | — |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-sigstore-timestamp-authority | 1.2.3-2 ... 2.1.3-2 (9 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-sigstore-timestamp-authority | 1.2.3-2, 1.2.9-1 |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 91 of 171 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 9 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 80 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-11 20:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-10-01 06:40 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
Show 66 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-19 15:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-12 07:53 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-24 13:02 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-08 08:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 08:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-27 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-07-23 13:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-23 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
2 shownDebian:13:golang-github-sigstore-timestamp-authority
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:1517 · redhat:RHSA-2026:3087
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-66564?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-66564 published?
Is CVE-2025-66564 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-66564?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-66564?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-66564
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-66564?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.