quic-go is an implementation of the QUIC protocol in Go. Prior to version 0.42.0, an attacker can cause its peer to run out of memory sending a large number of NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames that retire old connection IDs. The receiver is supposed to respond to each retirement frame with a RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frame. The attacker can prevent the receiver from sending out (the vast majority of) these RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames by collapsing the peers congestion window (by selectively acknowledging received packets) and by manipulating the peer's RTT estimate. Version 0.42.0 contains a patch for the issue. No known workarounds are available.
CVE-2024-22189
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.1% (64th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 49EG Risk 49/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity75% × 45%The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.Exploitation1.1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 1.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 64th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
April 4, 2024
Last Modified
April 15, 2026
References (4)
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/commit/4a99b816ae3ab03ae5449d15aac45147c85ed47a
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://github.com/quic-go/quic-go/security/advisories/GHSA-c33x-xqrf-c478
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://seemann.io/posts/2024-03-19-exploiting-quics-connection-id-management
- security-advisories@github · CVE Programhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JqXtYcZAtIA&t=3683s
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2024-22189(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2024-22189Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)
CVE-2024-22189
- RHSA-2025:15847Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.23.0 Release.
- RHSA-2024:8534Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 Product Release Update
- RHSA-2024:5094Red Hat Product SecurityMedium
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh Containers for 2.6.0 security update
- RHSA-2024:0041Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.16.0 bug fix and security update
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | devspaces/traefik-rhel9:3.23-1756504388 | 2025-09-15 | redhat |
| redhat | receptor-0:1.4.9-2.el9ap | 2024-10-28 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift-service-mesh/proxyv2-rhel9:2.6.0-18 | 2024-08-07 | redhat |
| redhat | openshift4/ose-coredns-rhel9:v4.16.0-202406131906.p0.g04d84f7.assembly.stream.el9 | 2024-06-27 | redhat |
| redhat | rhacm2/volsync-rhel9:v0.9.2-8 | 2024-06-26 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go | 0.19.3-1 ... 0.59.0-2~bpo13+1 (30 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go | 0.29.0-1 ... 0.59.0-2~bpo13+1 (23 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go | — |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go | — |
| — |
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/quic-go/quic-go | — |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 89 of 199 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 11 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 110 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-12 18:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-11 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-07 14:24 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-06 15:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-30 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-17 20:36 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-16 14:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
Show 64 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-15 03:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-12 14:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-04 13:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:05 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:20 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-29 20:43 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-28 21:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-16 02:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-13 07:37 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-12 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-30 16:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-28 15:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-27 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 23:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-21 15:23 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-20 17:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-07-19 14:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 61st percentile
- 2026-07-19 02:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 61st percentile
- 2026-07-18 10:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 61st percentile
- 2026-07-15 16:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 61st percentile
- 2026-07-15 01:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 61st percentile
- 2026-07-13 22:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 61st percentile
- 2026-07-13 06:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 61st percentile
- 2026-07-12 05:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 61st percentile
- 2026-07-11 08:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 61st percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
8 shownDebian:11:golang-github-lucas-clemente-quic-go · Go:github.com/quic-go/quic-go
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2024:5094 · redhat:RHSA-2024:0041 · redhat:RHSA-2025:15847
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-770
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2024-22189?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2024-22189 published?
Is CVE-2024-22189 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2024-22189?
How do I remediate CVE-2024-22189?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2024-22189
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2024-22189?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.