Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals. When cloning a repository Git knows to optionally fetch a bundle advertised by the remote server, which allows the server-side to offload parts of the clone to a CDN. The Git client does not perform sufficient validation of the advertised bundles, which allows the remote side to perform protocol injection. This protocol injection can cause the client to write the fetched bundle to a location controlled by the adversary. The fetched content is fully controlled by the server, which can in the worst case lead to arbitrary code execution. The use of bundle URIs is not enabled by default and can be controlled by the bundle.heuristic config option. Some cases of the vulnerability require that the adversary is in control of where a repository will be cloned to. This either requires social engineering or a recursive clone with submodules. These cases can thus be avoided by disabling recursive clones. This vulnerability is fixed in v2.43.7, v2.44.4, v2.45.4, v2.46.4, v2.47.3, v2.48.2, v2.49.1, and v2.50.1.
CVE-2025-48385
“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.
This high-severity CVE scores 8.6 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.1% (64th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.6
- EG Score
- 8.6HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 39EG Risk 39/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity86% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation1.1% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 1.1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 64th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.6): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.6 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.6 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 1.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 8, 2025
Last Modified
April 15, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 1, 2026oss-security - Multiple vulnerabilities fixed in Git
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/07/08/4Arbitrary file writes via bundle-uri parameter injection · Advisory · git/git · GitHub
https://github.com/git/git/security/advisories/GHSA-m98c-vgpc-9655Vendor Advisories for CVE-2025-48385(17)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2025:15672Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.13.60 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2025:15847Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.23.0 Release.
- RHSA-2025:15828Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: updated web-terminal/tooling container image
- RHSA-2025:15827Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: updated web-terminal/tooling container image
- RHSA-2025:14858Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.16.47 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2025:14853Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.14.56 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2025:14396Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.15.57 bug fix and security update
- RHSA-2025:14059Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Container Platform 4.17.38 bug fix and security update
- +9 more
Patch Availability(18)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(9 across 9 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.19(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| git | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.20(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| git | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.21(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| git | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.22(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| git | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.23(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| git | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| git | — |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| git | 1:2.39.2+next.20230215-1, 1:2.39.2-1.1, 1:2.39.5-0+deb12u1, 1:2.39.5-0+deb12u2 |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| git | 1:2.47.2-0.2 |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| git | 1:2.47.2-0.2 ... 1:2.50.0~rc0+next.20250528-1 (9 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(2)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 93 of 221 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 7 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 128 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 64th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-18 14:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-18 05:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 17:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-11 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 19:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.1% · 63rd percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:10 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
Show 68 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-30 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-09-27 13:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-23 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-21 21:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-21 06:49 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-12 15:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-08 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-05 15:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-02 04:28 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-08-26 14:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-25 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-24 14:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-24 09:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-23 00:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-20 22:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-19 17:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-18 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-17 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-16 14:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
- 2026-08-16 06:29 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-08-16 02:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-15 01:29 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-13 21:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-12 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
- 2026-08-11 13:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-10 23:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-08 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-05 19:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-04 15:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 55th percentile
- 2026-08-04 10:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-03 10:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-02 02:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-08-01 04:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-07-31 23:42 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-30 16:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-07-28 15:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-07-23 02:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 52nd percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownAlpine:v3.19:git
- CVE-2022-41903EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2022-23521EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-1353EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-17456EG 9.8EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-5260EG 9.3EPSS p96CRITICAL
- CVE-2025-48384NVD 8.0EG 9.0 KEVEPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2024-32002EG 9.0EPSS p98CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-21300NVD 8.0EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-1000117NVD 8.8EG 9.0EPSS p100CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-1354EG 8.8EPSS p98HIGH
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2025:11462 · redhat:RHSA-2025:14059 · redhat:RHSA-2025:13325
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2025-48385?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2025-48385 published?
Is CVE-2025-48385 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-48385?
How do I remediate CVE-2025-48385?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-48385
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-48385?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.