CVE-2026-94418

HIGHNVD 7.57.5—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-09-27. NVD baseline CVSS 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: <0.1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

An upstream fix is merged but not yet released — mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation) until the release ships, then apply it.

Under WOLFSSL_SMALL_CERT_VERIFY, ProcessPeerCertParse() runs the certificate signature check separately from the parse to keep peak memory down, then merges the two results, but it merged the signature result back only when the parse returned 0, so any parse error hid it. ParseCertRelative() reaches its validity-date, name-constraint and critical-extension checks only after ConfirmSignature() has passed, so splitting the signature check out inverts the precedence that makes "override date errors" a sound policy, and ASN_SIG_CONFIRM_E is never surfaced anywhere. The attacker needs no key material from the real PKI and no CA compromise: a self-made certificate carrying the expected subject name, the trusted CA's subject as its issuer, arbitrary bytes where the signature goes, a validity window in the past and the attacker's own key pair is sufficient. Affected builds define WOLFSSL_SMALL_CERT_VERIFY, which is off by default, is not set implicitly by any platform or preset header, and is not reachable from any CMake option; the autotools routes are --enable-lowresource, --enable-leantls, --enable-tinytls13=cert and --enable-tinytls13=mutualauth, and examples/configs/user_settings_embedded.h reaches it through WC_CFG_SMALL_CERT_VERIFY, which ships as 0, while neither --enable-all nor --enable-distro enables it at all. The application must additionally install a verify callback through wolfSSL_CTX_set_verify() or wolfSSL_set_verify() with WOLFSSL_VERIFY_PEER that returns 1 for ASN_BEFORE_DATE_E or ASN_AFTER_DATE_E; wolfSSL ships this exact shape as myVerify() in wolfssl/test.h under VERIFY_OVERRIDE_DATE_ERR, which examples/client -D selects. An application with no callback, or whose callback returns preverify for date errors, still fails the handshake, and wolfSSL_CertManagerVerifyBuffer() and wc_CheckCertSignature() report ASN_SIG_CONFIRM_E correctly in the same binary. TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 are affected in both directions, and DTLS reaches the same function; where the forged certificate is a chain certificate the callback's consent causes it to be cached in the WOLFSSL_CTX certificate manager, so an exposed deployment must restart the context or the process rather than merely reconnect.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.
EPSS PROB
<0.1%
EPSS %ILE
below the 1st
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

An upstream fix is merged but not yet in a tagged release. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines until it ships, then apply the release.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 27, 2026

Last Modified

October 2, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_pr.
github_pr

Certificate verification and session cache hardening

Fix merged in wolfSSL/wolfssl PR #11500 on 2026-09-21 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/pull/11500

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-94418(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 08:56 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-04 08:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-03 20:19 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-03 20:19 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-03 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-03 07:42 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-03 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-03 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-02 19:00 UTCEG score recompute▲ 5.20
  11. 2026-10-02 19:00 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-02 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-02 18:59 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
  14. 2026-09-29 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-29 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-28 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-27 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-27 09:01 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-27 09:00 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-94418?
CVE-2026-94418 is a high vulnerability published on September 27, 2026. Under WOLFSSLSMALLCERTVERIFY, ProcessPeerCertParse() runs the certificate signature check separately from the parse to keep peak memory down, then merges the two results, but it merged the signature result back only when the parse returned 0, so any parse error hid it. ParseCertRelative() reaches…
When was CVE-2026-94418 disclosed?
CVE-2026-94418 was first published on September 27, 2026, with the most recent update on October 2, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-94418 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-94418 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a <0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (below the 1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-94418?
CVE-2026-94418 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-94418?
An upstream fix for CVE-2026-94418 has been merged but is not yet in a tagged release. Until it ships, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation, then update to the release that contains the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-94418 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-94418

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-94418?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.