CVE-2026-89407

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6%, top 52% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

NumberInput.looksLikeValidNumber() in FasterXML jackson-core pre-validates "stringified numbers" with two regular expressions: PATTERN_FLOAT ([+-]?[0-9]*[\.]?[0-9]+([eE][+-]?[0-9]+)?), present since 2.17.0, and PATTERN_FLOAT_TRAILING_DOT, added in 2.17.2. PATTERN_FLOAT places adjacent quantifiers over the same character class -- an optional [0-9]* run, an optional dot, then a required [0-9]+ run -- so input that ultimately fails to match forces Java's backtracking engine to retry every possible split point of the digit run. 

Matching cost therefore grows with the square of the input length. 

An attacker who can supply JSON that an application deserializes into a numeric target type reaches this method through jackson-databind's default String-to-number coercion (StdDeserializer and NumberDeserializers for BigDecimal, BigInteger, Double and Float). 

Because StreamReadConstraints.maxStringLength defaults to 20,000,000 characters, no constraint bounds the input before it reaches the regex. 

Testing by the reporter confirmed O(n^2) growth across five consecutive input-size doublings, with a single 160,000-character string consuming roughly 74 seconds in one call; a small number of concurrent requests of ordinary body size can therefore exhaust a server's request-handling thread pool. 

The affected method does not exist before 2.17.0, so 2.16.x and earlier releases are not affected. 

The fix replaces both regular expressions with a hand-rolled single-pass scan.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(medium)
EG Risk
65(Attend)
EG Risk 65/100SSVC: Attend

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
48%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 22, 2026

Last Modified

September 22, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 22, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr.
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

ReDoS: quadratic backtracking in NumberInput.PATTERN_FLOAT via looksLikeValidNumber() · Advisory · FasterXML/jackson-core · GitHub

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/security/advisories/GHSA-p6pp-m3f8-5c89
github_pr

Backport #1649 fix to 2.18: optimize "NumberInput.looksLikeValidNumber()"

Fix merged in FasterXML/jackson-core PR #1701 on 2026-09-11 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/pull/1701
github_pr

Fix #1649: optimize "NumberInput.looksLikeValidNumber()" implementation [GHSA-p6pp-m3f8-5c89]

Fix merged in FasterXML/jackson-core PR #1650 on 2026-08-09 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/pull/1650
generic

Optimize `NumberInput.looksLikeValidNumber` [CVE-2026-89407] · Issue #1649 · FasterXML/jackson-core · GitHub

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/1649

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 10× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-24 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-23 19:22 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-22 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-22 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-22 15:19 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-22 15:01 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-22 14:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89407?
CVE-2026-89407 is a high vulnerability published on September 22, 2026. NumberInput.looksLikeValidNumber() in FasterXML jackson-core pre-validates "stringified numbers" with two regular expressions: PATTERNFLOAT ([+-]?[0-9]*[\.]?[0-9]+([eE][+-]?[0-9]+)?), present since 2.17.0, and PATTERNFLOATTRAILINGDOT, added in 2.17.2. PATTERN_FLOAT places adjacent quantifiers over…
When was CVE-2026-89407 disclosed?
CVE-2026-89407 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 22, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-89407 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89407 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 52.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89407?
CVE-2026-89407 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89407?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-89407, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-89407

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89407?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.