TypeDeserializerBase._findDeserializer() in FasterXML jackson-databind caches the resolved deserializer under the raw, attacker-supplied type ID. When name-based polymorphism is configured with a fallback, for example @JsonTypeInfo(use = Id.NAME, defaultImpl = ...), every distinct unrecognized type ID resolves to the same fallback deserializer but is retained as its own key in the _deserializers map. That map has no configurable bound and lives for the lifetime of the type deserializer, so an attacker who can repeatedly supply fresh unknown type IDs causes monotonic memory retention across requests. The reporter observed 10,000 retained entries from 10,000 distinct unknown IDs, against a single entry for a control that repeated one unknown ID the same number of times, isolating attacker-controlled key cardinality from request volume. Exploitation requires an application that enables name-based polymorphism with a defaultImpl or equivalent fallback, accepts attacker-influenced type IDs, and reuses a long-lived ObjectMapper across requests. The fix stops caching fallback resolutions for unrecognized IDs and bounds both the number of cached entries and the length of a cacheable type ID.
CVE-2026-91776
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5%, top 59% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(medium)
- EG Risk
- 65(Attend)EG Risk 65/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 41%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 23, 2026
Last Modified
September 23, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 23, 2026Prevent unbounded growth of type id cache in `TypeDeserializer` [CVE-2026-91776] by pjfanning · Pull Request #6203 · FasterXML/jackson-databind · GitHub
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/issues/6203jackson-databind retains every unknown raw type ID · Advisory · FasterXML/jackson-databind · GitHub
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-wv8q-qhhj-9h54Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 7× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-24 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 15:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 02:27 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-91776?
When was CVE-2026-91776 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-91776 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-91776?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-91776?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-91776
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-91776?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.