CVE-2026-10050

HIGHPre-NVD 0.0
0.0
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No confirmed exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: CVSS: Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Eclipse Jetty Digest Authentication: ISO-8859-1 lossy encoding allows authentication bypass via character substitution

Summary

The DigestAuthentication.apply() method in Jetty's HTTP client uses getBytes(StandardCharsets.ISO_8859_1) at three locations (lines 171, 179, 196) to compute Digest auth response hashes. ISO-8859-1 silently replaces any character above U+00FF (Chinese, Japanese, Cyrillic, Arabic, Emoji, etc.) with 0x3F (?), causing all such characters to produce identical hash contributions. An attacker who knows a victim's username can bypass Digest authentication by replacing all non-Latin-1 characters in the password with ? characters, since the collision password produces the same MD5-based Digest response hash as the original password.

Details

Root Cause

In jetty-core/jetty-client/src/main/java/org/eclipse/jetty/client/DigestAuthentication.java, the apply() method computes the three Digest auth hashes (H(A1), H(A2), and the final response) using ISO-8859-1 character encoding:

// Line 171 — H(A1)
String hashA1 = toHexString(digester.digest(a1.getBytes(StandardCharsets.ISO_8859_1)));

// Line 179 — H(A2) String hashA2 = toHexString(digester.digest(a2.getBytes(StandardCharsets.ISO_8859_1)));

// Line 196 — Final response hash final String hashA3 = toHexString(digester.digest(a3.getBytes(StandardCharsets.ISO_8859_1)));

ISO-8859-1 (Latin-1) can only encode characters in the range U+0000–U+00FF. Any character outside this range — including all CJK, Cyrillic, Arabic, Greek, Hangul, and emoji characters — is silently replaced with the byte 0x3F (?). String.getBytes(ISO_8859_1) in Java performs this replacement without any warning or exception.

PoC

Password: "我爱Java!密码123★" (7 non-Latin-1 characters)

UTF-8 encoding: 45 bytes → MD5 H(A1) = 9a4e61484f228633d5d0f95d1bbb0a99 ISO-8859-1: 31 bytes → MD5 H(A1) = d60ddc903d71913bcc3ab4a94f7fc239 Collision "??...": 31 bytes → MD5 H(A1) = d60ddc903d71913bcc3ab4a94f7fc239 ← IDENTICAL

Multi-language confirmation — all four language passwords below produce the same hash:

Chinese (密码123)  → H(A1) = db87f31e8d96cd15f9acec7eabdc4560
Korean  (비번123)  → H(A1) = db87f31e8d96cd15f9acec7eabdc4560
Cyrillic(аб123)    → H(A1) = db87f31e8d96cd15f9acec7eabdc4560
Greek   (αβ123)    → H(A1) = db87f31e8d96cd15f9acec7eabdc4560
Attacker(??123)    → H(A1) = db87f31e8d96cd15f9acec7eabdc4560 ← all collide!

Impact

Scenario 1: Authentication Bypass (Collision Attack)

If a service using Jetty for Digest authentication has a user with a non-Latin-1 password (e.g., Chinese, Japanese, Russian), an attacker can authenticate as that user using a collision password where all non-Latin-1 characters are replaced with ?:

  • Original password: 我爱Java!密码123★
  • Collision password: ??Java!??123?
  • Both produce identical MD5 hashes under ISO-8859-1 → Authentication succeeds

This affects any password containing characters > U+00FF, which covers:

  • Chinese (CJK): U+4E00–U+9FFF
  • Japanese (Hiragana/Katakana/Kanji): U+3040–U+30FF, U+4E00+
  • Korean (Hangul): U+AC00–U+D7AF
  • Cyrillic: U+0400–U+04FF (Russian, Ukrainian, Bulgarian, etc.)
  • Arabic: U+0600–U+06FF
  • Greek: U+0370–U+03FF
  • Latin Extended: U+0100–U+024F (accented European characters like ĉ, ğ, ñ when > U+00FF)
  • Emoji / Symbols > U+00FF

Scenario 2: Denial of Service for Non-Latin-1 Users

Most modern web applications store password hashes computed using UTF-8. When Jetty's Digest client computes a hash with ISO-8859-1, the bytes differ from what the server stored/expects. This means any user with non-ASCII (Latin-1+) characters in their password can never successfully authenticate via Digest auth — even the legitimate user. This is not just a security issue but a functional correctness bug that silently breaks authentication for most non-European-language users.

CVSS v3
EG Score
0.0(none)
EG Risk
0
EG Risk 0/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. It is distinct from the 0–10 EG Score, which measures severity.

EPSS
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 22, 2026

Last Modified

July 22, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-10050(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(3)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
org.eclipse.jetty.ee8:jetty-ee8-security12.1.0 ... 12.1.9 (10 versions)12.1.10
org.eclipse.jetty.ee9:jetty-ee9-security12.1.0 ... 12.1.9 (10 versions)12.1.10
org.eclipse.jetty:jetty-security12.1.0 ... 12.1.9 (10 versions)12.1.10

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 03:04 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-22 23:23 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(3)

What is CVE-2026-10050?
CVE-2026-10050 is a high vulnerability published on July 22, 2026. Eclipse Jetty Digest Authentication: ISO-8859-1 lossy encoding allows authentication bypass via character substitution Summary The DigestAuthentication.apply() method in Jetty's HTTP client uses getBytes(StandardCharsets.ISO88591) at three locations (lines 171, 179, 196) to compute Digest auth…
When was CVE-2026-10050 disclosed?
CVE-2026-10050 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 22, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-10050?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-10050, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-10050

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-10050?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.