CVE-2026-8798

HIGHPre-NVD 8.78.7—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
8.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 8.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 2.1.3, the native entropy source used on Intel platforms retried the CPU entropy instructions without any bound. RDSEED and RDRAND report failure through their carry flag, and the JNI seeding routine spun re-issuing the instruction for as long as that flag stayed clear, so a persistent failure of the on-chip entropy source - whether from a hardware fault, from the underlying DRBG being exhausted by contention across many cores, or from a hypervisor that does not provide the instruction - left the calling thread looping indefinitely inside the JNI call, where it could be neither interrupted nor timed out. Any operation drawing from the native entropy source could therefore hang, denying service to the application. The retry loops are now bounded (200 attempts for RDSEED and 20 for RDRAND, twice the baselines given in Intel's Digital Random Number Generator software implementation guide), pausing between attempts and, on exhaustion, clearing any partially written buffer and throwing rather than continuing to spin. The clear is performed by an un-elidable memzero, which uses a volatile pointer and an assembly memory barrier so that a compiler cannot optimise the erase away as a dead store. Bouncy Castle for Java (bcprov) is not affected, as it has no native entropy source; the 1.0.X and 2.0.X FIPS series are not affected.

CVSS v3
8.7
EG Score
8.7HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
54
EG Risk 54/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity87% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
34th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

August 8, 2026

Last Modified

September 3, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Aug 8, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

CVE‐2026‐8798 · bcgit/bc-java Wiki · GitHub

https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/wiki/CVE%E2%80%902026%E2%80%908798

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-8798(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.bouncycastle:bc-fips2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2
  • 2.1.0 up to 2.1.3: fixed in 2.1.3
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 72× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 187 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-04 05:41 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-03 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-02 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-30 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-29 05:41 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-27 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-25 04:12 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-23 21:33 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-22 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-22 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-20 22:49 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-20 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-19 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-18 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-18 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-17 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-17 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-17 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-16 02:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-15 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-15 14:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-15 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-14 11:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-14 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-14 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-13 13:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-13 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-13 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-12 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-12 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-11 16:18 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-11 16:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-09-11 09:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-09-11 04:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-10 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-10 17:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-10 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-09 18:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-09 05:59 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-09 05:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-09-08 04:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-07 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-07 17:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-06 14:34 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-06 14:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-09-06 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-09-05 16:08 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-05 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-09-05 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-05 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-04 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-04 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-09-03 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-09-03 03:59 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-03 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-09-02 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-09-01 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-01 17:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-31 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-31 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-30 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-30 20:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-30 09:16 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-30 09:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-29 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-29 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-29 10:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-08-28 11:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-27 19:48 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-8798?
CVE-2026-8798 is a high vulnerability published on August 8, 2026. In Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 2.1.3, the native entropy source used on Intel platforms retried the CPU entropy instructions without any bound. RDSEED and RDRAND report failure through their carry flag, and the JNI seeding routine spun re-issuing the instruction for as long…
When was CVE-2026-8798 disclosed?
CVE-2026-8798 was first published on August 8, 2026, with the most recent update on September 3, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-8798 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-8798 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-8798?
CVE-2026-8798 has a CVSS base score of 8.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-8798?
No fix for CVE-2026-8798 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-8798 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-8798

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-8798?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.