CVE-2026-68096

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-10. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

audit: fix recursive locking deadlock in audit_dupe_exe()

A deadlock occurs in the audit subsystem when duplicating executable-related rules.

When a file is moved (e.g., via do_renameat2()), the VFS layer locks the parent directory (I_MUTEX_PARENT), which synchronously triggers an fsnotify_move event. If an existing executable audit rule matches the file being moved, the audit subsystem catches this event and calls audit_dupe_exe() to duplicate the watch and update the rule. Then, audit_alloc_mark() would call kern_path_parent() to resolve the path, leading to a blind attempt to acquire the exact same I_MUTEX_PARENT lock already held by the task, resulting in the following recursive locking deadlock:

============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.12.0-55.27.1.el10_0.x86_64+debug #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- mv/5099 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888132845358 (&inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __kern_path_locked+0x10a/0x2f0

but task is already holding lock: ffff888132846b58 (&inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_directories+0x13f/0x2b0

other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 ---- lock(&inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key/1); lock(&inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key/1);

* DEADLOCK *

May be due to missing lock nesting notation

6 locks held by mv/5099: #0: ffff888112a9c440 (sb_writers#13) at: do_renameat2+0x34c/0xbc0 #1: ffff888112a9c790 (&type->s_vfs_rename_key#3) at: do_renameat2+0x415/0xbc0 #2: ffff888132846b58 (&inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key/1) at: lock_two_directories+0x13f/0x2b0 #3: ffff888132845358 (&inode->i_sb->s_type->i_mutex_dir_key/5) at: lock_two_directories+0x175/0x2b0 #4: ffffffffb3a1fb10 (&fsnotify_mark_srcu) at: fsnotify+0x454/0x28a0 #5: ffffffffaf886230 (audit_filter_mutex) at: audit_update_watch+0x36/0x11e0

stack backtrace: Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xb0 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xbd/0xca validate_chain+0x83a/0xf00 __lock_acquire+0xcac/0x1d20 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x360 down_write_nested+0x9f/0x230 __kern_path_locked+0x10a/0x2f0 kern_path_locked+0x26/0x40 audit_alloc_mark+0xfb/0x4f0 audit_dupe_exe+0x6c/0xe0 audit_dupe_rule+0x6c2/0xc00 audit_update_watch+0x4cc/0x11e0 audit_watch_handle_event+0x12c/0x1b0 send_to_group+0x5d0/0x8b0 fsnotify+0x615/0x28a0 fsnotify_move+0x1d8/0x630 vfs_rename+0xdcd/0x1df0 do_renameat2+0x9d4/0xbc0 __x64_sys_renameat+0x192/0x260 do_syscall_64+0x92/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f0491fe8c4e Code: 0f 1f 40 00 48 8b 15 c1 e1 16 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 b8 ff ff ff ff c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 08 01 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 0a c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8b 15 89 RSP: 002b:00007ffc7210bf38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000108 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f0491fe8c4e RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 00007ffc7210e6c8 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 00005575eb2dae2a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005575eb2dae2a R13: 00007ffc7210e6c8 R14: 0000000000000003 R15: 00000000ffffff9c

The aforementioned deadlock can be consistently reproduced by running the script below:

audit-dupe-exe-deadlock.sh -------------------------- #!/bin/bash auditctl -D mkdir -p /tmp/foo touch /tmp/file auditctl -a always,exit -F exe=/tmp/file -F path=/tmp/file -S all -k dr mv /tmp/file /tmp/foo/file rm -Rf /tmp/foo

This patch fixes the issue by introducing struct audit_watch_ctx to pass the fsnotify event context down to audit_alloc_mark(). By utilizing the already-resolved directory inode provided by the event, we bypass the kern_path_parent() path resol ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
43rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-19). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 14, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

audit: fix recursive locking deadlock in audit_dupe_exe() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81905b5acbe77284734438df3fbec1158e6429a3
Web page

audit: fix recursive locking deadlock in audit_dupe_exe() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d1f66c69898ffb1a718926c32a777ecc471caca
Web page

audit: fix recursive locking deadlock in audit_dupe_exe() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40879c39d6740f3dddfb52b5d6ba7fb8cceb84d8
Web page

audit: fix recursive locking deadlock in audit_dupe_exe() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b601938314c24fcd1afb6659cad92fe96c9c2f8
Web page

audit: fix recursive locking deadlock in audit_dupe_exe() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/36eb77f14b4e6f2dc1008c1fabe31236397be27a

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68096(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (32 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.101-1: fixed in 6.12.101-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (161 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.6-1: fixed in 7.1.6-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(9)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 94× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 283 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 183 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-19 21:41 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-19 21:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  4. 2026-10-19 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-19 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-19 20:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-18 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-16 17:35 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-16 17:35 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-16 17:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  14. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  15. 2026-10-16 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-16 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  18. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  19. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-13 10:17 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-13 10:17 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-13 10:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  23. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 15:45 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 14:06 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-06 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-06 18:52 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-06 18:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  11. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-05 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-05 18:29 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-05 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  15. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  18. 2026-10-04 05:27 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-04 05:27 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-04 05:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  21. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-03 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-03 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-03 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  25. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  26. 2026-10-02 09:24 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-02 09:24 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-02 09:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  29. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  30. 2026-10-01 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-01 12:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  32. 2026-09-30 22:45 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-30 22:45 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-30 22:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  35. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  36. 2026-09-29 05:26 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-29 05:26 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-29 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  39. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-28 05:58 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-28 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  42. 2026-09-27 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-27 16:59 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-27 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  46. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  47. 2026-09-25 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-25 04:06 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-25 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  50. 2026-09-24 04:09 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-24 04:09 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-24 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  53. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  54. 2026-09-23 14:46 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-23 14:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  56. 2026-09-23 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-23 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-23 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  59. 2026-09-22 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-22 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  61. 2026-09-21 23:20 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-21 23:20 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-21 23:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  64. 2026-09-21 02:13 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-21 02:13 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-21 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  67. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  68. 2026-09-20 10:50 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-20 10:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  70. 2026-09-19 20:05 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-19 20:05 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-19 20:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  73. 2026-09-19 06:24 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-19 06:24 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-19 06:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpg4-cv8q-2gfg · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68096?
CVE-2026-68096 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 10, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: audit: fix recursive locking deadlock in auditdupeexe() A deadlock occurs in the audit subsystem when duplicating executable-related rules. When a file is moved (e.g., via do_renameat2()), the VFS layer locks the parent directory…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-68096 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-68096 was published on August 10, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-68096 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68096 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (43rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68096?
CVE-2026-68096 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68096?
A fix for CVE-2026-68096 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-68096 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68096

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68096?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.