CVE-2026-84783

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-29. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 6 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it.

Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.

CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free

Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.

Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time.

FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.

OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3.

This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan.

The fix has been developed by Bob Beck.

-- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 29, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 29, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit de97a1a54f43 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit de97a1a54f43 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/de97a1a54f43edefd43b5084ecac54ecadb33081

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatopenssl3-main-3.5.8-1.hum12026-09-23redhat
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum12026-08-25redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 39× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 08:31 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 08:31 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 20:39 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 08:47 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 08:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 20:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-10-03 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-03 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-02 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-02 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-02 21:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-10-02 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-02 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-10-01 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-01 21:25 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-01 21:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-10-01 09:34 UTCVendor advisory
Show 14 more
  1. 2026-10-01 09:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-30 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-30 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-30 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-30 09:50 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-30 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-29 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-29 21:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-29 16:54 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.50
  11. 2026-09-29 16:53 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
  12. 2026-09-29 16:24 UTCNVD update
  13. 2026-09-29 15:38 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-29 15:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-84783?
CVE-2026-84783 is a high vulnerability published on September 29, 2026. Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it. Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server…
When was CVE-2026-84783 disclosed?
CVE-2026-84783 was first published on September 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-84783 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-84783 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-84783?
CVE-2026-84783 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-84783?
A fix for CVE-2026-84783 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-84783 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-84783

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-84783?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.