CVE-2026-82751

HIGHPre-NVD 8.38.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 74% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per sponsored payment by a large multiplier and to have the sponsor pay for provisioning an access key on the client's own account.

When the server sponsors Tempo payments, MPP.Methods.Tempo.FeePayerPolicy.measure/3 in lib/mpp/methods/tempo/fee_payer_policy.ex bounds the gas fields, the fee budget, the validity window and the access list of the client-signed 0x76 envelope, but does not check whether the envelope carries the optional key_authorization field. A client can attach a fully signed key authorization, provisioning a new access key with token spending limits on its own account, alongside the normal payment call. The key and each limit entry are persistent storage writes billed as intrinsic gas to the sponsor, bounded only by the gas_limit ceiling. At the reporter's default of one key with three token limits the sponsored cost rises from about 46,587 gas to about 1,808,700 gas, and the client keeps a valid access key it paid nothing for.

This issue affects mpp: from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1.

CVSS v3
8.3
EG Score
8.3(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity83% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
26%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 6, 2026

Last Modified

September 8, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 6, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
github_commit

commit 0482572b47e1 (ZenHive/mpp)

Fix landed in ZenHive/mpp commit 0482572b47e1 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/commit/0482572b47e1ffe1537ab80ab613d47b92833c2d
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82751
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Gas draining and free key provisioning via MPP Tempo fee-payer sponsorship · Advisory · ZenHive/mpp · GitHub

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/security/advisories/GHSA-rpwj-vrf7-4x36

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-82751(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Hex(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
mpp0.10.0 ... 0.9.0 (20 versions)0.16.1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-11 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-11 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-10 12:31 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-10 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-09 23:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-09 09:06 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-09 09:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-08 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-08 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-08 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-08 09:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-07 19:55 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-07 19:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-07 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-06 17:31 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-06 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-06 16:23 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-82751?
CVE-2026-82751 is a high vulnerability published on September 6, 2026. Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per sponsored payment by a large multiplier and to have the sponsor pay for provisioning an access key on the client's own account. When the server sponsors…
When was CVE-2026-82751 disclosed?
CVE-2026-82751 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 6, 2026, with the most recent update on September 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-82751 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-82751 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 74.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-82751?
CVE-2026-82751 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-82751?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-82751, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-82751

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-82751?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.