CVE-2026-59252

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.2 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6%, top 52% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:eef, epss
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated
8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to drain the fee-payer wallet, resulting in denial of service for legitimate clients.

When the mpp Elixir library is configured as fee payer (fee_payer: true), the MPP.Methods.Tempo payment method co-signs and broadcasts a client-supplied EVM transaction without first validating that the client-supplied gas_limit is sufficient to complete the intended call. A malicious client can submit a signed transferWithMemo transaction with gas_limit deliberately set just below the amount required for successful execution. The server co-signs the transaction and broadcasts it via rpc_broadcast_sync. The transaction runs out of gas during EVM execution and reverts, but the fee-payer wallet is still charged for the burned gas while the client pays nothing and receives no resource. Repeated requests from one or more malicious clients drain the fee-payer wallet at near-zero cost to the attacker, ultimately preventing the server from sponsoring gas for legitimate payment requests.

The wait_for_confirmation = false (optimistic) path is also affected: it invokes simulate_payment_call via eth_call, but that simulation omits the gas parameter and therefore does not catch out-of-gas conditions.

This issue affects mpp: from 0.2.0 before 0.6.0.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2(medium)
EG Risk
53(Track)
EG Risk 53/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity82% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
48%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 17, 2026

Last Modified

July 18, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 17, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59252
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Gas Draining with low gas limit · Advisory · ZenHive/mpp · GitHub

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/security/advisories/GHSA-vj8p-hp9x-gh47
github_commit

commit d84e3e528db3 (ZenHive/mpp)

Fix landed in ZenHive/mpp commit d84e3e528db3 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/commit/d84e3e528db39654540c2035ea0fbdf7b950d3d1
generic

Missing gas_limit validation in mpp Tempo fee-payer enables wallet drain | Erlang Ecosystem Foundation CNA

https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59252.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-59252(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Hex(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
mpp0.2.0, 0.3.0, 0.3.1, 0.3.2, 0.4.00.6.0

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 81× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 194 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-08 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-08 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-06 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-05 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-05 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-31 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-31 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-30 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-30 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-30 03:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-28 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-28 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-27 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-26 23:51 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-26 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-26 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-25 23:49 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-25 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-24 23:03 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-24 23:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-24 11:10 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-24 11:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-23 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-23 11:21 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-23 11:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-22 23:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-22 11:33 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-22 11:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-21 23:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-21 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-20 23:19 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-20 23:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-20 11:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-19 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-19 23:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-19 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-18 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-18 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-18 02:02 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-18 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-17 12:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-17 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-17 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-16 12:45 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-16 12:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-16 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-15 12:57 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-15 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-15 01:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-14 13:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-14 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-14 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-13 13:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-13 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-13 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-12 13:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-12 01:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-11 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-11 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-11 01:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-08-10 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-10 02:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-09 14:11 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-09 14:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-09 02:18 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-09 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-08 14:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-08 02:30 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-08 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-59252?
CVE-2026-59252 is a high vulnerability published on July 17, 2026. Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to drain the fee-payer wallet, resulting in denial of service for legitimate clients. When the mpp Elixir library is configured as fee payer (feepayer: true), the MPP.Methods.Tempo payment…
When was CVE-2026-59252 disclosed?
CVE-2026-59252 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 17, 2026, with the most recent update on July 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-59252 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-59252 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 51.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-59252?
CVE-2026-59252 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.2 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-59252?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-59252, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-59252

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-59252?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.