CVE-2026-59252

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.2 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:eef
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated
8.2
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to drain the fee-payer wallet, resulting in denial of service for legitimate clients.

When the mpp Elixir library is configured as fee payer (fee_payer: true), the MPP.Methods.Tempo payment method co-signs and broadcasts a client-supplied EVM transaction without first validating that the client-supplied gas_limit is sufficient to complete the intended call. A malicious client can submit a signed transferWithMemo transaction with gas_limit deliberately set just below the amount required for successful execution. The server co-signs the transaction and broadcasts it via rpc_broadcast_sync. The transaction runs out of gas during EVM execution and reverts, but the fee-payer wallet is still charged for the burned gas while the client pays nothing and receives no resource. Repeated requests from one or more malicious clients drain the fee-payer wallet at near-zero cost to the attacker, ultimately preventing the server from sponsoring gas for legitimate payment requests.

The wait_for_confirmation = false (optimistic) path is also affected: it invokes simulate_payment_call via eth_call, but that simulation omits the gas parameter and therefore does not catch out-of-gas conditions.

This issue affects mpp: from 0.2.0 before 0.6.0.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2(low)
EPSS
28.7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 17, 2026

Last Modified

July 18, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 17, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59252
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Gas Draining with low gas limit · Advisory · ZenHive/mpp · GitHub

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/security/advisories/GHSA-vj8p-hp9x-gh47
github_commit

commit d84e3e528db3 (ZenHive/mpp)

Fix landed in ZenHive/mpp commit d84e3e528db3 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/commit/d84e3e528db39654540c2035ea0fbdf7b950d3d1
generic

Missing gas_limit validation in mpp Tempo fee-payer enables wallet drain | Erlang Ecosystem Foundation CNA

https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59252.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-59252(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Hex(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
mpp0.2.0, 0.3.0, 0.3.1, 0.3.2, 0.4.00.6.0

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 35× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-18 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-18 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-07-18 04:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-07-18 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-07-18 03:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-07-18 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-18 02:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-07-18 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-07-18 02:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-07-18 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-07-18 02:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-07-18 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-07-18 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-07-18 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-07-18 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-07-18 01:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-07-18 00:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-07-17 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 10 more
  1. 2026-07-17 22:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-07-17 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-17 22:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-07-17 14:01 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-07-17 14:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-07-17 12:35 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-17 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-07-17 12:00 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-17 10:19 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-07-17 10:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-59252?
CVE-2026-59252 is a high vulnerability published on July 17, 2026. Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to drain the fee-payer wallet, resulting in denial of service for legitimate clients. When the mpp Elixir library is configured as fee payer (feepayer: true), the MPP.Methods.Tempo payment…
When was CVE-2026-59252 disclosed?
CVE-2026-59252 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 17, 2026, with the most recent update on July 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-59252 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-59252 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 28.7% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-59252?
CVE-2026-59252 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.2 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-59252?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-59252, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-59252

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-59252?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.