CVE-2026-82750

HIGHPre-NVD 8.38.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 74% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per sponsored payment by a large multiplier and to have the sponsor pay for EIP-7702 account delegations of the client's choosing.

When the server sponsors Tempo payments, MPP.Methods.Tempo.FeePayerPolicy.measure/3 in lib/mpp/methods/tempo/fee_payer_policy.ex bounds the gas fields, the fee budget, the validity window and the access list of the client-signed 0x76 envelope, but never reads its aa_authorization_list field. Every signed delegation in that list is charged as intrinsic gas before the payment call runs, so a client attaching delegations from throwaway authority keys makes the sponsor pay for them within the default gas_limit ceiling. At the reporter's default of seven entries the sponsored cost rises from about 46,575 gas to about 1,884,087 gas. Because each entry is applied as a persistent set-code delegation, a client can also upgrade its own accounts to delegated code at the sponsor's expense.

This issue affects mpp: from 0.2.0 before 0.16.1.

CVSS v3
8.3
EG Score
8.3(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity83% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
26%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 6, 2026

Last Modified

September 8, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 6, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
github_commit

commit 0482572b47e1 (ZenHive/mpp)

Fix landed in ZenHive/mpp commit 0482572b47e1 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/commit/0482572b47e1ffe1537ab80ab613d47b92833c2d
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82750
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Gas draining and free EIP-7702 account delegation via MPP Tempo fee-payer sponsorship · Advisory · ZenHive/mpp · GitHub

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/security/advisories/GHSA-5qrp-r24c-w6jr

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-82750(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Hex(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
mpp0.10.0 ... 0.9.0 (20 versions)0.16.1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 23× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-11 13:15 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-11 13:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-11 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-10 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-10 15:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-10 04:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-09 17:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-09 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-09 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-08 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-08 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-08 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-08 13:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-08 02:13 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-08 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-07 15:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-07 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-06 17:31 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-06 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-06 16:23 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-82750?
CVE-2026-82750 is a high vulnerability published on September 6, 2026. Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per sponsored payment by a large multiplier and to have the sponsor pay for EIP-7702 account delegations of the client's choosing. When the server sponsors…
When was CVE-2026-82750 disclosed?
CVE-2026-82750 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 6, 2026, with the most recent update on September 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-82750 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-82750 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 74.2% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-82750?
CVE-2026-82750 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-82750?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-82750, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-82750

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-82750?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.