NLTK versions before 3.10.3 contain a filesystem containment bypass vulnerability in the Downloader.download and Downloader.incr_download methods that allows attackers to overwrite files outside the install root through pre-existing hardlinks. Attackers with write access to a shared downloader directory can create hardlinks pointing to outside-root files that are then overwritten during normal package extraction, mutating files outside the intended install tree.
CVE-2026-81727
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-27. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.
- CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.1
- EG Score
- 7.1HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 48EG Risk 48/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity71% × 45%The EG Score, 7.1 of 10.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 7th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 27, 2026
Last Modified
August 31, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026NLTK before 3.10.3 Hardlink File Overwrite via downloader | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nltk-before-3.10.3-hardlink-file-overwrite-via-downloaderDownloader.download follows hardlinks and overwrites outside-root files · Advisory · nltk/nltk · GitHub
https://github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-81727(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:73987Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.3.7 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- RHSA-2026:69539Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.5.1 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
- GHSA-f794-5jv7-7672GitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
NLTK: Downloader.download follows hardlinks and overwrites outside-root files
Patch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhoai/odh-llama-stack-core-rhel9:1789121286 | 2026-09-30 | redhat |
| redhat | rhoai/odh-ta-lmes-job-rhel9:1788935863 | 2026-09-21 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nltk | 3.10.0-1 ... 3.9.3-1 (9 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nltk | 3.10.0-1 ... 3.9.3-1 (6 versions) |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nltk | 3.10.0-1, 3.10.1-1, 3.9.1-2, 3.9.2-1, 3.9.3-1 |
| — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| nltk | 0.8 ... 3.9b1 (68 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 86× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 98 of 129 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 31 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 16:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-12 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-10 15:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-10 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 01:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-09 03:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 03:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-08 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 01:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-07 09:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 20:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-06 20:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-06 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
Show 73 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-05 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 18:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-05 05:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-05 05:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-04 16:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 04:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 15:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-02 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 22:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-02 10:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-10-01 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-30 05:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 12:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 21:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 20:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 20:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-27 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 18:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 18:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-25 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-25 03:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 14:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
- 2026-09-24 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 01:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 12:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 00:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 00:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-21 22:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-20 21:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-19 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 05:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-17 01:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 12:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-15 11:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-13 20:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 18:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-10 15:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 00:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-07 17:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 15:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-05 01:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:12:nltk
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:69539 · redhat:RHSA-2026:73987
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-81727?
When was CVE-2026-81727 made public?
Is CVE-2026-81727 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81727?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-81727?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-81727
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-81727?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.