CVE-2026-80952

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

i3c: master: Fix info leak and UAF in device unregister path

i3c_master_unregister_i3c_devs() clears i3cdev->dev->desc before calling device_unregister(). During device_unregister(), device_del() emits a KOBJ_REMOVE uevent and unbinds the driver while the device descriptor is still expected to be valid. As a result, i3c_device_uevent() and a racing modalias_show() can observe a NULL desc and fall back to an uninitialized stack struct i3c_device_info, leaking kernel stack contents in the generated modalias. Driver .remove() callbacks may also encounter an unexpected NULL desc during unbind.

Keep desc valid until device_unregister() has completed. Since device_unregister() drops the device reference and may free the device, take an extra reference with get_device() before unregistering. Clear desc afterwards and release the extra reference with put_device(). This preserves the release-time invariant that desc must be NULL while avoiding both the information leak and a potential use-after-free from writing desc after the device has been released.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

i3c: master: Fix info leak and UAF in device unregister path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d2c743efd2d1ee64e94324664808f623dd865872
Web page

i3c: master: Fix info leak and UAF in device unregister path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4837be0f9ac2efe5e83b35a696b6242c473d280c
Web page

i3c: master: Fix info leak and UAF in device unregister path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94fb9786d67a8f8b899e77381620f86bad94fdf7
Web page

i3c: master: Fix info leak and UAF in device unregister path - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c16b6f25e0cc2dd1055dde1256cbf5a9e888cf49

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80952(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2018.18) @ resolute2026-10-13ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 36× in last 7d / 180× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 191 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 91 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 06:23 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-13 06:23 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-13 06:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  5. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-11 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  10. 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-11 06:54 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 06:54 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-11 06:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-10 17:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  19. 2026-10-10 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-10 06:25 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-10 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  22. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-09 19:27 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-09 19:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  25. 2026-10-08 23:34 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-08 23:34 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-08 23:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  3. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-08 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-08 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  6. 2026-10-08 00:40 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-08 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-08 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  9. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  10. 2026-10-07 13:44 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-07 13:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  12. 2026-10-07 02:44 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-07 02:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-10-06 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-06 15:47 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-06 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-06 04:28 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-06 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-06 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  22. 2026-10-05 17:13 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-05 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-10-05 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-05 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-05 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  28. 2026-10-04 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-04 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  30. 2026-10-04 08:09 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-04 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  32. 2026-10-03 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-03 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-03 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  35. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  36. 2026-10-03 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-03 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  38. 2026-10-02 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-02 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-02 20:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  41. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  42. 2026-10-02 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-02 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  44. 2026-10-01 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-01 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-01 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  47. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  48. 2026-10-01 12:02 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-01 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  50. 2026-10-01 00:48 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-10-01 00:48 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-01 00:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  53. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  54. 2026-09-30 13:51 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-30 13:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  56. 2026-09-30 01:47 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-30 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-30 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  59. 2026-09-29 07:16 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-29 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-29 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-09-28 20:19 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-28 20:19 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-28 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  65. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  66. 2026-09-28 08:45 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-28 08:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  68. 2026-09-27 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-27 21:49 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-27 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  71. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  72. 2026-09-27 10:50 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-27 10:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m64m-jwhp-5878 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  74. 2026-09-26 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-26 23:37 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-80952?
CVE-2026-80952 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i3c: master: Fix info leak and UAF in device unregister path i3cmasterunregisteri3cdevs() clears i3cdev->dev->desc before calling deviceunregister(). During deviceunregister(), devicedel() emits a KOBJREMOVE uevent and unbinds the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-80952 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-80952 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-80952 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80952 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-80952?
CVE-2026-80952 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80952?
A fix for CVE-2026-80952 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-80952 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-80952

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80952?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.