CVE-2026-78329

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 65% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cisa-adp, epss
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel Undertow component.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.11.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.

UndertowEndpoint defaulted its headerFilterStrategy field to the base HttpHeaderFilterStrategy and pushed that instance into the UndertowHttpBinding it creates lazily, overwriting the UndertowHeaderFilterStrategy that DefaultUndertowHttpBinding installs in its own constructor. Unless a deployment supplied a custom binding or an explicit headerFilterStrategy, the undertow-specific filtering therefore never executed on endpoint-configured routes: the strategy object was constructed and immediately replaced before it could be consulted. The consequence is that the legacy websocket. Exchange-header prefix was not filtered at the undertow transport boundary in either direction, so an undertow HTTP consumer mapped inbound wire headers of that form onto the Exchange, where an undertow WebSocket producer reads them as dispatch directives and can be made to deliver to a peer other than the one the route selected; and header names that undertow itself does not accept were mapped onto the Exchange rather than being skipped. Rest DSL consumers were never affected, because UndertowComponent assigns UndertowRestHeaderFilterStrategy explicitly, which extends the undertow strategy. This is not a regression of CVE-2025-30177: the base HttpHeaderFilterStrategy configures the inbound Camel-prefix filter itself, so the protection introduced by that advisory continued to work through the base class and was never lost. What the change did was leave the undertow strategy orphaned on the endpoint path, with the effect that two subsequent corrections written into it - one skipping header names undertow rejects, one filtering the legacy websocket. prefix in both directions - were applied to a class the endpoint no longer used and never took effect in the releases that shipped them.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, configure the strategy explicitly rather than relying on the default, for example by binding an UndertowHeaderFilterStrategy in the registry and referencing it on the endpoint as undertow:http://0.0.0.0:8080/foo?headerFilterStrategy=#myStrategy, and additionally strip the dispatch headers at the trust boundary with removeHeaders(“websocket.*”). Note a residual limitation that upgrading does not remove: the undertow component deliberately keeps the websocket. values as part of its externally visible API contract, and UndertowProducer reads them with in.getHeader, which does not consult a HeaderFilterStrategy at all. The restored filtering is therefore defence in depth at the undertow transport boundary only. A route that carries an untrusted message from a non-undertow consumer into an undertow producer is not protected by this fix and must strip those headers itself.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
59(Track)
EG Risk 59/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
35%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 27, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-78329 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-78329.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-78329(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
org.apache.camel:camel-undertow4.11.0 ... 4.14.8 (12 versions)4.14.9

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:36 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-29 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-28 14:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-28 10:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-28 06:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-28 02:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-27 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-27 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-27 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-27 12:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-27 08:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-27 04:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-27 00:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-26 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-26 19:27 UTCEG score recompute 9.80
  21. 2026-08-26 19:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-26 19:26 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.8 · severity → CRITICAL
  23. 2026-08-26 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-26 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 4 more
  1. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-24 17:18 UTCNVD update
  3. 2026-08-24 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-24 16:31 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-78329?
CVE-2026-78329 is a critical vulnerability published on August 24, 2026. Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel Undertow component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.11.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. UndertowEndpoint defaulted its headerFilterStrategy field to the base HttpHeaderFilterStrategy and pushed…
When was CVE-2026-78329 disclosed?
CVE-2026-78329 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 27, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-78329 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-78329 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 64.5% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-78329?
CVE-2026-78329 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-78329?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-78329, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-78329

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-78329?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.