The Lean 4 kernel does not check that the body of an opaque declaration is closed. environment::add_opaque omits the check_no_metavar_no_fvar call that the definition and theorem paths perform, so a value containing a free variable that is absent from the local context is not rejected outright. A metaprogram can first cause the kernel to create a temporary local of type False and record its type in the type checker's inference cache, then restore the local context while that cache entry persists on the same type checker instance, and finally submit an opaque declaration whose value is the now-unbound variable. The cache lookup answers before the branch that would test membership of the local context, so the kernel infers the cached type and admits an opaque constant of type False, from which any proposition follows. The declaration is accepted through the ordinary checked path at maximum kernel checking, without sorry, unsafeCast, debug.skipKernelTC, addDeclWithoutChecking, foreign code or a modified .olean file, and the result carries no axioms. Fixed in 4.32.2 by adding the missing closure check.
CVE-2026-72711
Score 6.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-24. the CNA's CVSS baseline 6.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.3
- EG Score
- 6.3(high)
- EG Risk
- 28(Track)EG Risk 28/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity63% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 2%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 24, 2026
Last Modified
August 29, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Aug 24, 2026Lean 4 before 4.32.2 Kernel Accepts Opaque Declaration With an Unbound Free Variable | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lean-4-before-kernel-accepts-opaque-declaration-with-an-unbound-free-variablefix: kernel to check opaque values for fvars
Fix merged in leanprover/lean4 PR #14498 on 2026-07-22 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/14498Missing check apparently allows proof of False after adversarial metaprogram · Issue #14484 · leanprover/lean4 · GitHub
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/14484GitHub - leanprover/lean4: Lean 4 programming language and theorem prover · GitHub
https://github.com/leanprover/lean4GitHub - endrazine/lean-cve-poc-14484 · GitHub
https://github.com/endrazine/lean-cve-poc-14484Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72711(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 11:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 11:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-29 01:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 00:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 00:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-24 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 20:11 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-20
- CVE-2005-0050EG 10.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2004-1019EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2004-0840EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2003-1425EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2003-1487EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2002-1874EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2002-2236EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2002-2365EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2002-1358EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2002-1359EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-72711?
When was CVE-2026-72711 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-72711 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72711?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72711?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72711
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72711?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.