CVE-2026-72711

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.36.3
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 6.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-24. the CNA's CVSS baseline 6.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:vulncheck, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekElevated
6.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 6.3Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The Lean 4 kernel does not check that the body of an opaque declaration is closed. environment::add_opaque omits the check_no_metavar_no_fvar call that the definition and theorem paths perform, so a value containing a free variable that is absent from the local context is not rejected outright. A metaprogram can first cause the kernel to create a temporary local of type False and record its type in the type checker's inference cache, then restore the local context while that cache entry persists on the same type checker instance, and finally submit an opaque declaration whose value is the now-unbound variable. The cache lookup answers before the branch that would test membership of the local context, so the kernel infers the cached type and admits an opaque constant of type False, from which any proposition follows. The declaration is accepted through the ordinary checked path at maximum kernel checking, without sorry, unsafeCast, debug.skipKernelTC, addDeclWithoutChecking, foreign code or a modified .olean file, and the result carries no axioms. Fixed in 4.32.2 by adding the missing closure check.

CVSS v3
6.3
EG Score
6.3(high)
EG Risk
28(Track)
EG Risk 28/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity63% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 29, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 24, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_pr.
generic

Lean 4 before 4.32.2 Kernel Accepts Opaque Declaration With an Unbound Free Variable | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lean-4-before-kernel-accepts-opaque-declaration-with-an-unbound-free-variable
github_pr

fix: kernel to check opaque values for fvars

Fix merged in leanprover/lean4 PR #14498 on 2026-07-22 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/14498
generic

Missing check apparently allows proof of False after adversarial metaprogram · Issue #14484 · leanprover/lean4 · GitHub

https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/14484
generic

GitHub - leanprover/lean4: Lean 4 programming language and theorem prover · GitHub

https://github.com/leanprover/lean4
generic

GitHub - endrazine/lean-cve-poc-14484 · GitHub

https://github.com/endrazine/lean-cve-poc-14484

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72711(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-29 11:59 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-29 11:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-29 01:01 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-29 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-28 00:07 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-28 00:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-26 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-26 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-25 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-25 22:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-24 20:25 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-24 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-24 20:11 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72711?
CVE-2026-72711 is a medium vulnerability published on August 24, 2026. The Lean 4 kernel does not check that the body of an opaque declaration is closed. environment::addopaque omits the checknometavarno_fvar call that the definition and theorem paths perform, so a value containing a free variable that is absent from the local context is not rejected outright. A…
When was CVE-2026-72711 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72711 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-72711 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72711 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72711?
CVE-2026-72711 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 6.3 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72711?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72711, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72711

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72711?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.