CVE-2026-71300

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-24. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel Atmosphere Websocket component.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0.

The camel-atmosphere-websocket producer selects which connected WebSocket peers a message is delivered to through Exchange headers, and the string values of those headers sat outside the Camel namespace: websocket.connectionKey and websocket.connectionKey.list, along with websocket.sendToAll, websocket.eventType and websocket.errorType. WebsocketEndpoint extends ServletEndpoint and so inherits HttpHeaderFilterStrategy, which filters only the Camel and camel prefixes; the dotted names therefore fell outside the filtered namespace and were admitted in both directions by every HTTP-family consumer. In a route bridging an HTTP consumer into an atmosphere-websocket producer, an external sender could supply the list header and take over the producer's dispatch decision. WebsocketProducer.process tests the list header before the single-key header, so an injected value discarded the recipient the route had selected: a notification intended for one connected client could be suppressed, or delivered instead to a different client whose connection key the sender knows. The header need not be a query parameter and need not be supplied as a list literally - Camel's HTTP binding promotes a repeated header name, and a bracketed value, to a List when mapping onto the Exchange - so an ordinary inbound HTTP header is sufficient to reach the list-valued branch. This is distinct from CVE-2026-55993, which concerns the consumer-side query-parameter path in the same component. The behaviour dates back to the introduction of these constants, first released in 2.17.0, and was unchanged until this fix.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.9. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.4. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the dispatch headers at the trust boundary before the producer, for example with removeHeaders(“websocket.*”) placed between the HTTP consumer and the atmosphere-websocket producer. Note that the fix renames the header string values into the Camel namespace, which is a breaking change for routes that set them by literal string: routes referencing the WebsocketConstants fields symbolically are unaffected, and the change is documented in the upgrade guides. As defence in depth, do not bridge an untrusted HTTP consumer directly into a WebSocket producer whose dispatch is header-driven without stripping the dispatch namespace first.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
53rd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 24, 2026

Last Modified

October 12, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Oct 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-71300 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-71300.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-71300(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.camel:camel-atmosphere-websocket4.19.0, 4.20.0, 4.21.0
  • 4.0.0 up to 4.14.9: fixed in 4.14.9
  • 4.15.0 up to 4.18.4: fixed in 4.18.4
  • 4.19.0 up to 4.22.0: fixed in 4.22.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 55× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 112 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 12 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 13:05 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 04:52 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-08 03:57 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 16:40 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 01:26 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-03 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-02 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-01 21:03 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  3. 2026-09-30 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  5. 2026-09-30 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-28 21:32 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-28 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  9. 2026-09-27 14:32 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  11. 2026-09-27 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  13. 2026-09-24 18:53 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-23 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  16. 2026-09-22 19:29 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-21 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  19. 2026-09-20 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  21. 2026-09-19 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-18 22:30 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  24. 2026-09-17 21:12 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-16 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  27. 2026-09-16 05:29 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  29. 2026-09-15 03:59 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  31. 2026-09-13 17:33 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-12 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  34. 2026-09-11 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  36. 2026-09-11 10:59 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-10 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  39. 2026-09-09 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  41. 2026-09-07 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-06 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  44. 2026-09-05 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-04 15:37 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-04 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  48. 2026-09-02 17:08 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  50. 2026-09-01 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  52. 2026-09-01 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  54. 2026-08-30 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  56. 2026-08-30 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  58. 2026-08-29 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  60. 2026-08-28 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-08-28 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-08-28 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-08-28 02:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-08-27 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  65. 2026-08-27 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-27 18:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-08-27 14:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-08-27 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  69. 2026-08-27 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-08-27 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-08-26 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-08-26 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-26 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  75. 2026-08-26 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m5r8-w65q-8wjf · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-71300?
CVE-2026-71300 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 24, 2026. Improper input validation vulnerability in Apache Camel Atmosphere Websocket component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.4, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-atmosphere-websocket producer selects which connected WebSocket peers a message is…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-71300 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-71300 was published on August 24, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-71300 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-71300 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-71300?
CVE-2026-71300 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-71300?
A fix for CVE-2026-71300 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-71300 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-71300

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-71300?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.