RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 3.13.0 until 4.3.3, 4.2.9 , 4.1.14, 4.0.24, and 3.13.18, Federation upstream in RabbitMQ skips vhost authorization allowing cross-vhost message access. what the bug lets you do. A policymaker on one vhost reads and drains messages out of another vhost it has no permission on. With the default ack-mode the source messages are consumed (deleted), not copied. Why that should not 1. Federation validates the upstream URI without any vhost-access Cross-vhost message read/drain from a per-vhost policymaker, breaking vhost tenancy This issue is fixed in versions 4.3.3, 4.2.9 , 4.1.14, 4.0.24, and 3.13.18.
CVE-2026-67412
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.0 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (20th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.0
- EG Score
- 6.0MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 43EG Risk 43/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity60% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 20th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 25, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026RabbitMQ 4.3.3
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.3.3
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.3RabbitMQ 4.2.9
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.9
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.9Federation upstream in RabbitMQ skips vhost authorization allowing cross-vhost message access · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-42pc-678q-v8qjVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-67412(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-3-main-4.3.6-1.hum1 | 2026-09-15 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 03:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 03:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 05:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 07:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 07:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 11:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 11:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 12:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 14:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 12:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
Show 3 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-25 16:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:67552
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-67412?
When was CVE-2026-67412 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-67412 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67412?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67412?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-67412
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67412?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.