RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 4.0.0 until 4.3.3, 4.2.9, 4.1.14, and 4.0.23, Shovel does not format state logged by the crash reporter and can leave unencrypted credentials in a crash dump file. the shovel worker genserver processes does not implement the formatstatus/2 callback. When these processes crash (e.g., due to network partitions, connection failures), the OTP SASL error handler writes the full process state , including plaintext AMQP passwords and URIs , to the error log. This is particularly severe for the shovel worker, which stores deobfuscated plaintext URIs (including amqp://user:password@host format) in its genserver state for the entire process Automatic Credential Exposure: Shovel worker crashes (common during network partitions) automatically write plaintext upstream/downstream passwords to error logs No Special Configuration Needed: Unlike DEBUG logging, SASL error reports are always active Broad. This issue is fixed in versions 4.3.3, 4.2.9, 4.1.14, and 4.0.23.
CVE-2026-67406
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (18th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.6
- EG Score
- 4.6MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 21EG Risk 21/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity46% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 18th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 25, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026RabbitMQ 4.3.3
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.3.3
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.3RabbitMQ 4.2.9
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.9
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.9Shovel does not format state logged by the crash reporter and can leave unencrypted credentials in a crash dump file · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-q44f-9vc5-grh7Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-3-main-4.3.6-1.hum1 | 2026-09-15 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 00:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 00:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 03:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 05:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 05:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 10:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 12:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 14:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 18:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 17:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:39 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:67552
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-67406?
When was CVE-2026-67406 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-67406 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67406?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67406?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-67406
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67406?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.