axios versions from 0.28.0 before 0.33.0 and from 1.0.0 before 1.18.0 contain uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON (exposed as axios.formToJSON() and used internally when serializing FormData with Content-Type: application/json). When an application passes attacker-controlled FormData field names, a field name with thousands of nested bracket-delimited segments causes unbounded recursion in buildPath(), exhausting the JavaScript call stack (RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded) and causing denial of service for that request, or process termination in applications without appropriate error handling.
CVE-2026-67312
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 73% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.3
- EG Score
- 6.3(medium)
- EG Risk
- 44(Track)EG Risk 44/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity63% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 27%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 1, 2026
Last Modified
August 3, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 1, 2026axios 0.28.0 before 0.33.0 Denial of Service via formToJSON | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/axios-before-denial-of-service-via-formtojsonDeep formToJSON Key Recursion Can Cause Denial of Service · Advisory · axios/axios · GitHub
https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-pmv8-rq9r-6j72Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-67312(4)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- GHSA-4ww2-rjh2-xpv9GitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
axios versions from 0.28.0 before 0.33.0 and from 1.0.0 before 1.18.0 contain uncontrolled...
- RHSA-2026:48758Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update
- RHSA-2026:48241Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update
- RHSA-2026:47619Red Hat Product SecurityCritical
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | jaeger-main-2.20.0-0.8.hum1 | 2026-07-30 | redhat |
| redhat | grafana13-1-main-13.1.1-0.3.hum1 | 2026-07-29 | redhat |
| redhat | grafana12-4-main-12.4.6-0.2.hum1 | 2026-07-28 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-axios | 0.21.1+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (40 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-axios | 1.11.0+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (20 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-axios | 1.11.0+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (10 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-axios | 1.11.0+dfsg-1 ... 1.8.4+dfsg-1 (9 versions) | 1.18.0-1 | — |
npm(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| axios | — | 1.18.0 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 53× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-15 11:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 11:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 11:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 12:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 13:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 13:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 13:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 14:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 15:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 15:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 28 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-08 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-07 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 16:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 16:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 17:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 17:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 17:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 17:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 17:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-04 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 18:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-03 19:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 19:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-03 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-03 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-02 12:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-01 13:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-01 12:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-01 12:42 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-1009EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-1162EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-400
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-67312?
When was CVE-2026-67312 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-67312 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67312?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67312?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-67312
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67312?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.