RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 4.2.0 until 4.2.9 and 4.3.3, OAuth2 isinteger(Exp) guard skips token-expiry checks for float exp. validatetokenexpiry/1 (lines 208-214) and expirytimestamp/1 (138-144) both guard with 'when isinteger(Exp)' and fall through to ok/never for float values. josejwt:verify validates only the signature, not exp. With float exp, no expiry validation occurs anywhere in the If the IdP emits exp as a JSON float (RFC 7519 permits fractional NumericDate), both the login-time expiry check and the mid-connection disconnect timer are silently skipped , an already-expired token is accepted, and connections never time OAuth2 backend enabled IdP emits float exp (uncommon; mainstream IdPs emit integers) Attacker possesses a previously-valid signed. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.9 and 4.3.3.
CVE-2026-67242
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (37th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.3
- EG Score
- 6.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 59EG Risk 59/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity63% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.5%
- EPSS %ILE
- 37th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 25, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026RabbitMQ 4.3.3
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.3.3
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.3RabbitMQ 4.2.9
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.9
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.9commit f189a8824c9e (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit f189a8824c9e — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/f189a8824c9efbce46bd9438fcdbda4521cfc923commit d10a369a9665 (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit d10a369a9665 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/d10a369a96658d0fba1050bd43c732e58fcf28fdOAuth2 is_integer(Exp) guard skips token-expiry checks for float exp · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-rrj4-g94f-rqj9Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-67242(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rabbitmq-server4-3-main-4.3.6-1.hum1 | 2026-09-15 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 26× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-03 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 19:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 18:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 14:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 20:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
Show 1 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-25 16:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:67552
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-67242?
When was CVE-2026-67242 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-67242 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67242?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67242?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-67242
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67242?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.