CVE-2026-66908

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-24. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Improper Authentication vulnerability in Apache Camel Platform HTTP Main component.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.8.0 before 4.22.0.

The camel-main embedded HTTP server can protect its endpoints with JWT authentication, configured through authenticationEnabled together with the JWT keystore properties. JWTAuthenticationConfigurer.buildJwtOptions returned null when neither jwtIssuer nor jwtAudience was configured, and the caller then skipped the JWTAuthOptions.setJWTOptions call entirely, so the Vert.x JWTAuth instance was built from the keystore alone. The result was that inbound tokens were checked only for signature and expiry: the iss and aud claims were not validated at all. Nothing signalled this - the server started normally and reported no warning - so a deployment configured the documented way silently enforced less than the operator believed it had enabled, and the component documentation itself presented signature and expiry checking as the default with issuer and audience as an optional extra. Both the application server and the management server were affected, because the omission was in each of the two configureAuthentication paths. Any unexpired token signed by any key the configured keystore trusts was therefore accepted, regardless of which issuer minted it or which audience it was intended for. How far that reaches depends on the trust set of the keystore: where the signing key belongs to a shared or multi-tenant identity provider, a token legitimately issued for an entirely different audience is accepted, while a keystore holding a dedicated signer narrows it to reuse of tokens minted for other services within the same trust domain. The jwtIssuer and jwtAudience options did not exist before 4.21.0, so on earlier releases there was no supported way to have these claims enforced at all.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.22.0, which fixes the issue. From 4.22.0 the server refuses to start when a JWT keystore is configured but neither jwtIssuer nor jwtAudience is set, naming the properties involved, and a deployment that genuinely wants signature and expiry validation only must say so explicitly with the new jwtAllowMissingIssuerAndAudience option, which defaults to false. This behaviour is fixed only on 4.22.0. The 4.14.9 and 4.18.4 releases do not change the default: they add the jwtIssuer and jwtAudience options so that operators on those maintenance lines can enforce the claims by configuration, and an installation that upgrades to 4.14.9 or 4.18.4 without also setting at least one of those two properties is still accepting any unexpired token signed by a trusted key. Users on 4.14.x or 4.18.x should therefore upgrade to 4.14.9 or 4.18.4 and then set jwtIssuer, jwtAudience, or both. Releases from 4.8.0 up to and including 4.21.x offer no way to enforce these claims and should be moved to a version that does. Independently of version, restrict the JWT keystore to the smallest possible trust set - ideally a signer dedicated to this service rather than a shared identity-provider key - and where a gateway already validates issuer and audience in front of the server, ensure it cannot be bypassed.

Notes:

The JIRA ticket:  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24281  refers to the various commits that resolved the issue, and has more details.

The fail-closed guard could not be backported. The jwtIssuer and jwtAudience options were themselves only introduced in 4.21.0 by CAMEL-23525, so on camel-4.18.x and camel-4.14.x there was nothing an operator could set to satisfy the requirement and the guard would have broken every JWT deployment on those branches with no remedy available.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
34%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 24, 2026

Last Modified

August 28, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-66908 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-66908.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-66908(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 27× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 05:09 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-29 05:34 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 17:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-28 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-28 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-27 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-27 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-26 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-26 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-26 08:11 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-26 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-25 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 19:50 UTCEG score recompute 7.50
  18. 2026-08-25 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-25 19:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-24 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-24 20:25 UTCNVD update
  23. 2026-08-24 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 19:21 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  25. 2026-08-24 17:18 UTCNVD update
Show 2 more
  1. 2026-08-24 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-24 16:17 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-66908?
CVE-2026-66908 is a high vulnerability published on August 24, 2026. Improper Authentication vulnerability in Apache Camel Platform HTTP Main component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.8.0 before 4.22.0. The camel-main embedded HTTP server can protect its endpoints with JWT authentication, configured through authenticationEnabled together with the JWT…
When was CVE-2026-66908 disclosed?
CVE-2026-66908 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 24, 2026, with the most recent update on August 28, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-66908 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-66908 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 66.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-66908?
CVE-2026-66908 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-66908?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-66908, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-66908

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-66908?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.