CVE-2026-65633

HIGHPre-NVD 7.67.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (46th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated
7.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 7.6Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Improper Authentication vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows purpose-limited JWTs to be replayed as full bearer API credentials when a resource uses stateless bearer-token verification.

The bearer-token authentication helper AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers.retrieve_from_bearer/3 verifies an Authorization: Bearer JWT's signature and rejects tokens containing an act claim, but performs no check that the token's purpose claim equals user at the bearer boundary. When the resource is configured with require_token_presence_for_authentication?: false (the DSL default), the follow-on validate_token/3 helper returns {:ok, nil} without consulting the token resource, so no downstream check on purpose takes place either. As a result, any valid, non-expired JWT the library itself issued for a narrow, single-purpose flow (most notably the purpose: sign_in token that WebAuthn always emits during sign-in, and that the Password strategy emits when sign-in tokens are enabled) is accepted directly as a general-purpose bearer credential and resolves to a full current_user assignment.

This bypasses the library's intended token-exchange contract, in which the sign_in token is meant to be presented exactly once to a preparation that validates the purpose claim and immediately revokes the token. The first use of a still-valid sign-in token presented directly in the Authorization header succeeds because the stateless bearer path never scopes it to purpose == "user".

An attacker who obtains a not-yet-exchanged sign-in token for a target subject (for example via log or referrer leakage, an intercepted magic-link delivery channel, or a partially compromised intermediary) can present it as a bearer token and be authenticated as that subject, fully bypassing the intended one-time-use and revocation semantics. Exploitation additionally requires that the host application wire up retrieve_from_bearer/3 on a reachable route and uses either WebAuthn (sign-in tokens are always issued) or the Password strategy with sign_in_tokens_enabled?: true. Resources configured with require_token_presence_for_authentication?: true (including applications scaffolded by the Igniter installer since v4.5.0) and the session-based path (authenticate_resource_from_session/4) enforce purpose == "user" against the stored token record and are not affected.

This issue affects ash_authentication: from 3.10.5 before 4.14.2 and from 5.0.0-rc.0 before 5.0.0-rc.13.

CVSS v3
7.6
EG Score
7.6HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
50
EG Risk 50/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity76% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.6 of 10.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
46th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 1, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 124eddd1bbeb (team-alembic/ash_authentication)

Patch available: team-alembic/ash_authentication v4.14.2 (contains commit 124eddd1bbeb)

https://github.com/team-alembic/ash_authentication/commit/124eddd1bbeb40289c3fe8831ac10677a19fcf09
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 8cf8b2d44261 (team-alembic/ash_authentication)

Patch available: team-alembic/ash_authentication v5.0.0-rc.13 (contains commit 8cf8b2d44261)

https://github.com/team-alembic/ash_authentication/commit/8cf8b2d4426172be0900a3505e9491800b951750
Web page

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-65633
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Purpose-limited JWT accepted as full bearer authentication in `AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers.retrieve_from_bearer/3` · Advisory · team-alembic/ash_authentication · GitHub

https://github.com/team-alembic/ash_authentication/security/advisories/GHSA-6vcj-3h59-rrc3

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Hex(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
ash_authentication3.10.5 ... 5.0.0-rc.9 (131 versions)
  • 3.10.5 up to 4.14.2: fixed in 4.14.2
  • 5.0.0-rc.0 up to 5.0.0-rc.13: fixed in 5.0.0-rc.13
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 19:31 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 14:08 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 04:34 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  14. 2026-10-08 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  18. 2026-10-06 07:44 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 04:43 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  22. 2026-10-03 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  24. 2026-10-02 21:33 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
Show 65 more
  1. 2026-10-01 20:58 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  3. 2026-09-30 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  5. 2026-09-30 06:53 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-28 22:24 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  8. 2026-09-27 22:22 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-26 22:10 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  11. 2026-09-24 14:40 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-24 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  14. 2026-09-23 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-22 02:26 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-21 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  18. 2026-09-20 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-19 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  21. 2026-09-18 02:36 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-16 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  24. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  25. 2026-09-15 13:40 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-14 01:40 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-13 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-12 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  30. 2026-09-11 13:51 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  32. 2026-09-10 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-09 01:18 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  35. 2026-09-07 21:28 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  37. 2026-09-06 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  39. 2026-09-05 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  41. 2026-09-04 21:20 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-04 09:22 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  44. 2026-09-02 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  46. 2026-09-01 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  48. 2026-09-01 12:40 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  50. 2026-08-31 00:22 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  52. 2026-08-30 12:24 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  54. 2026-08-29 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  56. 2026-08-27 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-26 20:19 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  59. 2026-08-26 08:22 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-25 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-25 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  63. 2026-08-25 08:23 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-25 08:15 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.6 HIGH
  65. 2026-08-25 08:11 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-65633?
CVE-2026-65633 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 25, 2026. Improper Authentication vulnerability in team-alembic AshAuthentication allows purpose-limited JWTs to be replayed as full bearer API credentials when a resource uses stateless bearer-token verification. The bearer-token authentication helper AshAuthentication.Plug.Helpers.retrievefrombearer/3…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-65633 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-65633 was published on August 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 1, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-65633 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-65633 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (46th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-65633?
CVE-2026-65633 has a CVSS base score of 7.6 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-65633?
A fix for CVE-2026-65633 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-65633

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-65633?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.