CVE-2026-64114

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5

raw_send_hdrinc() validates that the caller-supplied IPv4 header fits within the message length:

iphlen = iph->ihl * 4; err = -EINVAL; if (iphlen > length) goto error_free;

if (iphlen >= sizeof(*iph)) { /* fix up saddr, tot_len, id, csum, transport_header */ }

It does not, however, reject ihl < 5. For such a packet the "if (iphlen >= sizeof(*iph))" branch is skipped, leaving the crafted iphdr untouched, but the packet is still handed to __ip_local_out() and onward. Downstream consumers that read iph->ihl assume a sane value: net/ipv4/ah4.c:ah_output() in particular subtracts sizeof(struct iphdr) from top_iph->ihl * 4 and passes the (signed-int-negative, then cast to size_t) result to memcpy(), producing an OOB access of length close to SIZE_MAX and a host kernel panic.

An IPv4 header with ihl < 5 is malformed by definition (RFC 791: "Internet Header Length is the length of the internet header in 32 bit words ... Note that the minimum value for a correct header is 5."). The kernel should not be willing to inject such a packet into its own output path.

Reject "iphlen < sizeof(*iph)" alongside the existing "iphlen > length" check. This matches the principle that locally constructed packets that re-enter the IP stack must pass the same basic sanity tests that a foreign packet would be subjected to.

Once this lands, the "if (iphlen >= sizeof(*iph))" wrapper around the fixup branch becomes redundant; left in place to keep the patch minimal and backport-friendly. A follow-up can unwrap it.

Note that commit 86f4c90a1c5c ("ipv4, ipv6: ensure raw socket message is big enough to hold an IP header") ensures the message buffer is large enough to hold an iphdr, but does not constrain the self-reported iph->ihl.

Reachability: the malformed packet source is any caller with CAP_NET_RAW, including an unprivileged process in a user+net namespace on a kernel with CONFIG_USER_NS=y. The reproduced AH crash also requires a matching xfrm AH policy on the outgoing route; a container granted CAP_NET_ADMIN can install that state and policy in its netns. Loopback bypasses xfrm_output, so the trigger uses a real netdev.

Reproduced on UML + KASAN: kernel-mode fault at addr 0x0 with memcpy_orig at the crash site. Same shape reproduces inside a rootless Docker container with --cap-add NET_ADMIN on a stock distro kernel.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 12, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc20dbd48c26e743f7e0845020c11ed2ce8b15ee
generic

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bbe0be67de296176e7243c76e3d9f02f6ae9ff0b
generic

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/915fab69823a14c170dbaa3b41978768e0fe62fc
generic

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7725cd3b471740fd23d25ed1da722c671fb2a5d3
generic

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a564f737ec54d63e8ee221d3ff396d07586d464
generic

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c5411fa4944ed99af3d9d1de750ea8169b6dac9
generic

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/145e9afa5b905229b4788bb72c3255f5a5f77508
generic

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1065b9efa4126df559b03a849c139ecfae92cd25

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64114(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 33× in last 7d / 168× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 218 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-26 23:40 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-26 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-26 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-26 11:42 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-26 11:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 10:54 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-25 10:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-24 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-24 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 22:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 11:00 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-24 11:00 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-24 11:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 23:03 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-23 23:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-23 10:38 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-23 10:38 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-23 10:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-22 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-22 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-22 10:44 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-22 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-22 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-21 22:47 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-21 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-21 10:50 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-21 10:50 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-21 10:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-20 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-20 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-20 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-20 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-19 22:58 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-19 22:58 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-19 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-19 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-19 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-18 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-18 19:44 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-18 19:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-18 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-18 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-17 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-17 15:23 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-17 15:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-17 03:25 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-17 03:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-16 15:28 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-16 15:28 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-16 15:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-16 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-16 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-16 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-15 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-15 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-15 03:37 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-15 03:37 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-15 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-14 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-14 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-14 03:42 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-14 03:42 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-14 03:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-13 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-13 15:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-13 03:48 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-13 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-12 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-12 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-12 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-12 12:42 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-12 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-12 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-11 12:43 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64114?
CVE-2026-64114 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 rawsendhdrinc() validates that the caller-supplied IPv4 header fits within the message length: iphlen = iph->ihl * 4; err = -EINVAL; if (iphlen > length) goto error_free; if (iphlen…
When was CVE-2026-64114 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64114 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 12, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64114 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64114 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64114?
CVE-2026-64114 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64114?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64114, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64114

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64114?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.