CVE-2026-64114

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5

raw_send_hdrinc() validates that the caller-supplied IPv4 header fits within the message length:

iphlen = iph->ihl * 4; err = -EINVAL; if (iphlen > length) goto error_free;

if (iphlen >= sizeof(*iph)) { /* fix up saddr, tot_len, id, csum, transport_header */ }

It does not, however, reject ihl < 5. For such a packet the "if (iphlen >= sizeof(*iph))" branch is skipped, leaving the crafted iphdr untouched, but the packet is still handed to __ip_local_out() and onward. Downstream consumers that read iph->ihl assume a sane value: net/ipv4/ah4.c:ah_output() in particular subtracts sizeof(struct iphdr) from top_iph->ihl * 4 and passes the (signed-int-negative, then cast to size_t) result to memcpy(), producing an OOB access of length close to SIZE_MAX and a host kernel panic.

An IPv4 header with ihl < 5 is malformed by definition (RFC 791: "Internet Header Length is the length of the internet header in 32 bit words ... Note that the minimum value for a correct header is 5."). The kernel should not be willing to inject such a packet into its own output path.

Reject "iphlen < sizeof(*iph)" alongside the existing "iphlen > length" check. This matches the principle that locally constructed packets that re-enter the IP stack must pass the same basic sanity tests that a foreign packet would be subjected to.

Once this lands, the "if (iphlen >= sizeof(*iph))" wrapper around the fixup branch becomes redundant; left in place to keep the patch minimal and backport-friendly. A follow-up can unwrap it.

Note that commit 86f4c90a1c5c ("ipv4, ipv6: ensure raw socket message is big enough to hold an IP header") ensures the message buffer is large enough to hold an iphdr, but does not constrain the self-reported iph->ihl.

Reachability: the malformed packet source is any caller with CAP_NET_RAW, including an unprivileged process in a user+net namespace on a kernel with CONFIG_USER_NS=y. The reproduced AH crash also requires a matching xfrm AH policy on the outgoing route; a container granted CAP_NET_ADMIN can install that state and policy in its netns. Loopback bypasses xfrm_output, so the trigger uses a real netdev.

Reproduced on UML + KASAN: kernel-mode fault at addr 0x0 with memcpy_orig at the crash site. Same shape reproduces inside a rootless Docker container with --cap-add NET_ADMIN on a stock distro kernel.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 12, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bc20dbd48c26e743f7e0845020c11ed2ce8b15ee
Web page

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bbe0be67de296176e7243c76e3d9f02f6ae9ff0b
Web page

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/915fab69823a14c170dbaa3b41978768e0fe62fc
Web page

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7725cd3b471740fd23d25ed1da722c671fb2a5d3
Web page

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a564f737ec54d63e8ee221d3ff396d07586d464
Web page

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3c5411fa4944ed99af3d9d1de750ea8169b6dac9
Web page

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/145e9afa5b905229b4788bb72c3255f5a5f77508
Web page

ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1065b9efa4126df559b03a849c139ecfae92cd25

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64114(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(30)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2053.55) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iotg-5.15 (5.15.0.1107.106) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1075 (5.15.0-1075.79) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1064.66~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-5.15 (5.15.0.1107.107) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1064.64) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1067.75) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1109.105) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1117.126) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1109.115~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1117.102) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iot-realtime-5.15 (5.15.0.1104.108) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1112.122~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-139.139) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1067.75+fips1) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.38) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1106.104) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1036.37) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1067.75~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1061.64) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (6.8.0-139.139.1) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1064.67+fips1) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-01ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.259-1: fixed in 5.10.259-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(25)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 307 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 207 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 11:45 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-13 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-01 08:10 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-01 08:10 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-01 08:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  23. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 07:15 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-28 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-28 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  3. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  4. 2026-09-24 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-24 03:35 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-24 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  8. 2026-09-23 01:53 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-23 01:53 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-23 01:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  12. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  13. 2026-09-18 04:13 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-18 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  15. 2026-09-17 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-17 05:18 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-17 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  18. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  19. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-16 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  22. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  23. 2026-09-14 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-14 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  25. 2026-09-13 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-13 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-13 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  28. 2026-09-13 07:34 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-13 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  30. 2026-09-12 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-12 19:34 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-12 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  33. 2026-09-12 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-12 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  35. 2026-09-11 18:41 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-11 18:41 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-11 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  38. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  39. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  40. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  41. 2026-09-07 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-07 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-07 23:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  44. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  45. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  46. 2026-09-06 12:48 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-06 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  48. 2026-09-05 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-05 21:49 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-05 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  51. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  52. 2026-09-05 09:51 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-05 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-05 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  55. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  56. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  57. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  58. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  59. 2026-08-31 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-31 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-31 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  63. 2026-08-30 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-30 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  65. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  68. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  69. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  70. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  73. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mpq7-q79j-37gw · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  75. 2026-08-26 23:40 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64114?
CVE-2026-64114 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 rawsendhdrinc() validates that the caller-supplied IPv4 header fits within the message length: iphlen = iph->ihl * 4; err = -EINVAL; if (iphlen > length) goto error_free; if (iphlen…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64114 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64114 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64114 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64114 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64114?
CVE-2026-64114 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64114?
A fix for CVE-2026-64114 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64114 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64114

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64114?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.