CVE-2026-64102

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math

A malicious connected siw peer can send an iWARP FPDU whose MPA length field (c_hdr->mpa_len, 16 bit big-endian, peer-controlled) is smaller than the fixed DDP/RDMAP header for the announced opcode. Soft-iWARP parses the full header in siw_get_hdr() based on iwarp_pktinfo[opcode] .hdr_len, but never compares mpa_len against that header length.

siw_tcp_rx_data() then derives

srx->fpdu_part_rem = be16_to_cpu(mpa_len) - fpdu_part_rcvd + MPA_HDR_SIZE;

where fpdu_part_rcvd equals iwarp_pktinfo[opcode].hdr_len at this point. For a tagged WRITE (hdr_len 16, MPA_HDR_SIZE 2) the smallest on-wire mpa_len of 0 yields fpdu_part_rem = -14, and any mpa_len below hdr_len - MPA_HDR_SIZE underflows to a negative int.

The signed value then flows into siw_proc_write()/siw_proc_rresp() as

bytes = min(srx->fpdu_part_rem, srx->skb_new);

is handed to siw_check_mem() as an int len (whose interval check addr + len > mem->va + mem->len is satisfied for a valid base when len is negative), and reaches siw_rx_data() -> siw_rx_kva() / siw_rx_umem() -> skb_copy_bits() as a signed copy length. The header copy branch in skb_copy_bits() promotes that to size_t, producing a multi-gigabyte read.

KASAN under a KUnit harness that drives the real kernel TCP receive path -- a loopback AF_INET socketpair, the malformed FPDU written via kernel_sendmsg, sk_data_ready firing in softirq, tcp_read_sock dispatching to siw_tcp_rx_data -- reports:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in skb_copy_bits+0x284/0x480 Read of size 4294967295 at addr ffff888... Call Trace: skb_copy_bits siw_rx_kva siw_rx_data siw_check_mem siw_proc_write siw_tcp_rx_data __tcp_read_sock siw_qp_llp_data_ready tcp_data_ready tcp_data_queue

Add the missing invariant at the earliest point where the peer header is fully assembled. iwarp_pktinfo[*].hdr_len - MPA_HDR_SIZE is exactly the value the siw transmitter uses as the minimum mpa_len for each opcode (drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c:33), so this matches the protocol contract. Out-of-range FPDUs terminate the connection with TERM_ERROR_LAYER_LLP / LLP_ETYPE_MPA / LLP_ECODE_FPDU_START -- which is RFC 5044 Section 8 error code 3 ("Marker and ULPDU Length fields do not agree on the start of an FPDU"), the correct framing-error class for this inconsistency.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
41%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 12, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 26, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c7c0c0f4379dedec12d24dbb9dded5d2db7fd9f2
generic

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/775b4dc9618a99a1fa48b57554041a5dc17e1336
generic

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/683f7cfbf514193d63c0efa079f3352bde84c2e0
generic

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a331582011d9e8089af8aa2a61ec6b4443bb245
generic

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33a8b5e971e294ec2a7b74211c545e09efd8e9ac
generic

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14553be882d9ce91749c9d64041de66e34ad8e70
generic

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1012896f4225e8f801ff3c1648023845b66dfb11
generic

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ce1bc9e46ecabe84772bb561e373c0d9876d6f2

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64102(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 62× in last 7d / 377× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 467 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-30 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-30 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-30 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-28 01:42 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-28 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-27 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-27 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-27 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-27 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-27 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-26 22:15 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-26 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-26 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-26 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-26 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-26 08:58 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-26 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-26 04:58 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-26 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-26 00:51 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-26 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-25 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-25 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-25 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-25 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-25 15:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-25 11:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-25 07:07 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-25 07:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-25 03:06 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-25 03:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-24 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-24 23:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-24 19:03 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-24 19:03 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-24 19:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-24 13:04 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-24 13:04 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-24 13:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-24 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-24 04:24 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-24 04:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-24 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-24 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-23 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-23 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-23 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-23 16:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-23 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-23 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-23 08:19 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-23 08:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-23 04:18 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-23 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-23 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-23 00:16 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-23 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-22 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-22 20:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-22 16:14 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-22 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-22 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-22 12:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-22 07:48 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-22 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-22 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-22 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-22 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-21 23:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-21 19:45 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-21 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-21 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-21 15:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-21 07:13 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-21 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-21 03:12 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-21 03:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-20 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-20 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-20 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-20 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-20 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-20 15:09 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-20 15:09 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64102?
CVE-2026-64102 is a critical vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math A malicious connected siw peer can send an iWARP FPDU whose MPA length field (chdr->mpalen, 16 bit big-endian, peer-controlled) is smaller than the fixed…
When was CVE-2026-64102 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64102 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 12, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64102 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64102 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 59.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64102?
CVE-2026-64102 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64102?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64102, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64102

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64102?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.