CVE-2026-64102

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math

A malicious connected siw peer can send an iWARP FPDU whose MPA length field (c_hdr->mpa_len, 16 bit big-endian, peer-controlled) is smaller than the fixed DDP/RDMAP header for the announced opcode. Soft-iWARP parses the full header in siw_get_hdr() based on iwarp_pktinfo[opcode] .hdr_len, but never compares mpa_len against that header length.

siw_tcp_rx_data() then derives

srx->fpdu_part_rem = be16_to_cpu(mpa_len) - fpdu_part_rcvd + MPA_HDR_SIZE;

where fpdu_part_rcvd equals iwarp_pktinfo[opcode].hdr_len at this point. For a tagged WRITE (hdr_len 16, MPA_HDR_SIZE 2) the smallest on-wire mpa_len of 0 yields fpdu_part_rem = -14, and any mpa_len below hdr_len - MPA_HDR_SIZE underflows to a negative int.

The signed value then flows into siw_proc_write()/siw_proc_rresp() as

bytes = min(srx->fpdu_part_rem, srx->skb_new);

is handed to siw_check_mem() as an int len (whose interval check addr + len > mem->va + mem->len is satisfied for a valid base when len is negative), and reaches siw_rx_data() -> siw_rx_kva() / siw_rx_umem() -> skb_copy_bits() as a signed copy length. The header copy branch in skb_copy_bits() promotes that to size_t, producing a multi-gigabyte read.

KASAN under a KUnit harness that drives the real kernel TCP receive path -- a loopback AF_INET socketpair, the malformed FPDU written via kernel_sendmsg, sk_data_ready firing in softirq, tcp_read_sock dispatching to siw_tcp_rx_data -- reports:

BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in skb_copy_bits+0x284/0x480 Read of size 4294967295 at addr ffff888... Call Trace: skb_copy_bits siw_rx_kva siw_rx_data siw_check_mem siw_proc_write siw_tcp_rx_data __tcp_read_sock siw_qp_llp_data_ready tcp_data_ready tcp_data_queue

Add the missing invariant at the earliest point where the peer header is fully assembled. iwarp_pktinfo[*].hdr_len - MPA_HDR_SIZE is exactly the value the siw transmitter uses as the minimum mpa_len for each opcode (drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c:33), so this matches the protocol contract. Out-of-range FPDUs terminate the connection with TERM_ERROR_LAYER_LLP / LLP_ETYPE_MPA / LLP_ECODE_FPDU_START -- which is RFC 5044 Section 8 error code 3 ("Marker and ULPDU Length fields do not agree on the start of an FPDU"), the correct framing-error class for this inconsistency.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
41st
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 12, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c7c0c0f4379dedec12d24dbb9dded5d2db7fd9f2
Web page

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/775b4dc9618a99a1fa48b57554041a5dc17e1336
Web page

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/683f7cfbf514193d63c0efa079f3352bde84c2e0
Web page

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a331582011d9e8089af8aa2a61ec6b4443bb245
Web page

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33a8b5e971e294ec2a7b74211c545e09efd8e9ac
Web page

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14553be882d9ce91749c9d64041de66e34ad8e70
Web page

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1012896f4225e8f801ff3c1648023845b66dfb11
Web page

RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ce1bc9e46ecabe84772bb561e373c0d9876d6f2

Patch Availability(30)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.1117.102) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-lowlatency-hwe-20.04-edge (6.8.0-139.139.1) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iotg-5.15 (5.15.0.1107.106) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-139.139) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-5.15 (5.15.0.1107.107) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1064.64) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1067.75) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2053.55) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1067.75+fips1) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.38) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1106.104) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp (6.8.0.1036.37) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (6.8.0-1067.75~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1117.126) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-aws-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1064.67+fips1) @ noble2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1109.115~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (6.8.0-1066.67~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1075 (5.15.0-1075.79) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1112.122~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1064.66~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-14ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-intel-iot-realtime-5.15 (5.15.0.1104.108) @ jammy2026-10-14ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.170.1.el8_102026-09-30redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.170.1.rt7.511.el8_102026-09-30redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.53.1.el9_82026-09-28redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.259-1: fixed in 5.10.259-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(22)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 70× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 610 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 510 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-14 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-14 08:51 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-14 08:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 04:49 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-13 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-13 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-12 06:11 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-12 06:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  20. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  23. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  24. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  25. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-01 12:33 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-01 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-01 08:13 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-01 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-01 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  7. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  8. 2026-09-28 13:07 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-28 13:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  14. 2026-09-24 13:11 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-24 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-09-24 08:25 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-24 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  22. 2026-09-23 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-23 09:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-09-23 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-23 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  26. 2026-09-23 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-23 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-23 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  29. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  30. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  31. 2026-09-18 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-18 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  33. 2026-09-18 04:13 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-18 04:13 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-18 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-09-17 09:56 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-17 09:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-09-17 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-17 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-17 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  42. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-16 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  46. 2026-09-14 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-14 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-09-14 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-14 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-09-14 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-14 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-09-13 22:55 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-13 22:55 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-13 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-09-13 16:11 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-13 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-09-13 11:44 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-13 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-09-13 07:25 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-13 07:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-09-13 03:23 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-13 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-09-12 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-12 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-12 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  66. 2026-09-12 14:05 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-12 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-09-12 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-12 10:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-09-12 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-12 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-09-12 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-12 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mhgq-v2h6-4f9w · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64102?
CVE-2026-64102 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/siw: Reject MPA FPDU length underflow before signed receive math A malicious connected siw peer can send an iWARP FPDU whose MPA length field (chdr->mpalen, 16 bit big-endian, peer-controlled) is smaller than the fixed…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64102 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64102 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64102 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64102 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64102?
CVE-2026-64102 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64102?
A fix for CVE-2026-64102 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64102 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64102

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64102?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.