CVE-2026-63941

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: arm64: Correctly cap ZCR_EL2 provided by a guest hypervisor

ZCR_EL2 can be updated by a VHE guest hypervisor either using ZCR_EL2 (which traps) or ZCR_EL1 (which does not trap). KVM handles both in different way:

  • on ZCR_EL2 trap, ZCR_EL2.LEN is immediately capped at the VM's own
VL limit. This has the potential to break existing SW that relies on the full LEN field to be stateful.
  • on ZCR_EL1 access, we do absolutely nothing.

On restoring the SVE context for an L2 guest, we directly restore the guest hypervisor's view of ZCR_EL2 into the physical ZCR_EL2. If the guest's view of the register was updated using the ZCR_EL2 accessor, the value has already been sanitised (with the caveat mentioned above).

But if the guest used ZCR_EL1, the raw value is written into the HW, and the L2 guest can now access VLs that it shouldn't.

Fix all the above by moving the VL capping to the restore points, ensuring that:

  • the HW is always programmed with a capped value, irrespective of
the accessor being used,
  • the ZCR_EL2.LEN field is always completely stateful, irrespective
of the accessor being used.

Additionally, move ZCR_EL2 to be a sanitised register, ensuring that only the LEN field is actually stateful. This requires some creative construction of the RES0 mask, as the sysreg generation script does not yet generate RAZ/WI fields.

[maz: rewrote commit message, tidy up access_zcr_el2()]

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8(medium)
EG Risk
44(Track)
EG Risk 44/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 20, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: arm64: Correctly cap ZCR_EL2 provided by a guest hypervisor - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83726330748981372bde86ed5411d7b306612991
generic

KVM: arm64: Correctly cap ZCR_EL2 provided by a guest hypervisor - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/742a9b5ccd8c46caf983ca90c94f855466968e34

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63941(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (160 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 32× in last 7d / 168× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 216 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 23:04 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 23:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-27 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-26 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-26 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-26 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-26 12:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-26 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-26 00:52 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-26 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-25 13:14 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-25 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-25 02:04 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-25 02:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 14:54 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-24 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-24 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-23 16:29 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-23 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-23 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-23 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-22 18:10 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-22 18:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-22 06:59 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-22 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-22 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-21 19:49 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-21 19:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-21 08:39 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-21 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-21 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-20 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-20 21:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-20 10:19 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-20 10:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-19 07:00 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-19 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-18 19:50 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-18 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-18 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-18 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-18 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-17 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-17 15:41 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-17 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-17 04:31 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-17 04:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-16 17:21 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-16 17:21 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-16 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-16 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-16 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-16 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-15 18:59 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-15 18:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-15 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-15 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-15 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-14 20:39 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-14 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-14 09:30 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-14 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-13 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-13 22:20 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-13 22:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-08-13 11:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-13 00:00 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-13 00:00 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-13 00:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-12 12:51 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-12 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-12 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-12 01:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-11 14:31 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-11 14:31 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63941?
CVE-2026-63941 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: arm64: Correctly cap ZCR_EL2 provided by a guest hypervisor ZCREL2 can be updated by a VHE guest hypervisor either using ZCREL2 (which traps) or ZCR_EL1 (which does not trap). KVM handles both in different way: on ZCREL2 trap,…
When was CVE-2026-63941 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63941 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63941 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63941 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 95.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63941?
CVE-2026-63941 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63941?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63941, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63941

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63941?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.