CVE-2026-63913

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — Patch released this week
8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check

An unintended behavior in the TCP conntrack state machine allows a connection to be forced into the CLOSE state using an RST packet with an invalid sequence number.

Specifically, after a SYN packet is observed, an RST with an invalid SEQ can transition the conntrack entry to TCP_CONNTRACK_CLOSE, regardless of whether the RST corresponds to the expected reply direction. The relevant code path assumes the RST is a response to an outgoing SYN, but does not validate packet direction or ensure that a matching SYN was actually sent in the opposite direction.

As a result, a crafted packet sequence consisting of a SYN followed by an invalid-sequence RST can prematurely terminate an active NAT entry. This makes connection teardown easier than intended.

So, tighten the state transition logic to ensure that RST-triggered CLOSE transitions only occur when the RST is a valid response to a previously observed SYN in the correct direction.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2(medium)
EG Risk
42(Track)
EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity82% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
59%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5547bebc416d56f56fb5b86dc20aabfa42165a0
generic

netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f206def4e86d810f927ba1d8e322ea72b29bce58
generic

netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d67c6adee8d1b65330d0174c4c367faba14e80a8
generic

netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bed6e04be8e6b9133d8b16d5a42d0e0ce674fa9a
generic

netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b98ab51c45c5608a1c19ce7fd17a3032469bb83f
generic

netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6476c17d536dbd321c073242e762ddb2713a1238
generic

netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2bb6d82b586ea5a4cb73bbdd6b7432e96096bc77
generic

netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2006979a15af5404bf932a325357683c0bac1656

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63913(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 34× in last 7d / 164× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 212 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:57 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 01:44 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-28 01:44 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-28 01:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 13:14 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-27 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-27 00:59 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-27 00:59 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-27 00:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-26 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-26 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-26 00:52 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-26 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-25 12:47 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-25 12:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-25 00:41 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-25 00:41 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-25 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-24 12:31 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-24 12:31 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-24 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-24 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-24 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-23 12:18 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-23 12:18 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-23 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-23 00:14 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-23 00:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-22 12:10 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-22 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-22 12:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-21 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-21 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-20 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-20 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-20 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-20 11:13 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-20 11:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-19 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-19 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-18 19:50 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-18 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-18 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-18 03:07 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-18 03:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-17 15:01 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-17 15:01 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-17 15:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-17 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-17 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-17 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-16 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-16 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-16 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-15 14:48 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-15 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-15 02:44 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-15 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-14 14:37 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-14 14:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-14 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-14 02:33 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-14 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-13 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-13 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-13 02:17 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-13 02:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-12 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-12 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-12 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-12 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-12 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-11 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-11 14:07 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-11 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63913?
CVE-2026-63913 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: conntrack: tcp: do not force CLOSE on invalid-seq RST without direction check An unintended behavior in the TCP conntrack state machine allows a connection to be forced into the CLOSE state using an RST packet with an…
When was CVE-2026-63913 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63913 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63913 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63913 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 41.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63913?
CVE-2026-63913 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.2 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63913?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63913, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63913

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63913?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.