CVE-2026-63920

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg

ip6_datagram_recv_specific_ctl() builds IPV6_{HOPOPTS,DSTOPTS,RTHDR} cmsgs (and their IPV6_2292* legacy counterparts) by trusting the on-wire hdrlen byte (ptr[1]) when computing the put_cmsg() length. The length was validated only at parse time (ipv6_parse_hopopts(), etc.). An nftables payload-write expression can rewrite hdrlen after parsing and before the skb reaches recvmsg; the write itself is in-bounds but put_cmsg() then reads up to ((hdrlen+1) << 3) = 2040 bytes from an 8-byte header. nftables is reachable from an unprivileged user namespace, so this is an unprivileged slab-out-of-bounds read:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in put_cmsg+0x3ac/0x540 put_cmsg+0x3ac/0x540 udpv6_recvmsg+0xca0/0x1250 sock_recvmsg+0xdf/0x190 ____sys_recvmsg+0x1b1/0x620

Add ipv6_get_exthdr_len() which validates that at least two bytes are accessible before reading the hdrlen field, then checks the computed length against skb_tail_pointer(skb), returning 0 on failure. Extension headers are kept in the linear skb area by pskb_may_pull() during input, so skb_tail_pointer() is the correct bound.

Use ipv6_get_exthdr_len() at all non-AH call sites: the five standalone cmsg blocks (HbH, 2292HbH, 2292DSTOPTS x2, 2292RTHDR) and the three standard cases in the extension-header walk loop (DSTOPTS, ROUTING, default). AH retains an inline bounds check because its length formula differs ((ptr[1]+2)<<2).

The walk loop also gets a pre-read bounds check at the top to validate ptr before any case accesses ptr[0] or ptr[1].

When the walk loop detects a corrupted header, return from the function instead of continuing to process later socket options.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
6%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eb18a1b1644e4cad978df2131e2bb9a2e6886992
generic

ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd433671fef381fdaf7b530c631e6b782d66e224
generic

ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a35daeabb433686234b010ebf7b53778dbd6c9b8
generic

ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a29768d56eb3798c052ad3281b05596e695a17af
generic

ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/931b4a1f13408c2507719890f78f7227c34a0282
generic

ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81394827dfb72772c50d0ae3bdfa094428a5d76d
generic

ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d330eff318c0f44d4fb0ad2c2aef38f87f24c90
generic

ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08464413e628803bd10cb1df68d0138665f2f885

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63920(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 165× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 214 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:57 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-27 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-26 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-26 22:26 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-26 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 07:25 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-26 07:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-25 18:49 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-25 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 06:45 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-25 06:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-24 19:10 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-24 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 05:10 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-24 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-23 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-23 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-23 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-23 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-22 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-22 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-22 07:50 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-22 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-22 07:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-21 20:30 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-21 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-21 09:10 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-21 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-21 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-20 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-20 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-20 10:30 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-20 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-19 08:04 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-19 08:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-18 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-18 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-18 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-18 09:24 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-18 09:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-17 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-17 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-17 21:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-17 08:54 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-17 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-16 21:35 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-16 21:35 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-16 21:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-16 10:14 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-16 10:14 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-16 10:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-15 22:55 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-15 22:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-15 11:35 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-15 11:35 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-15 11:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-15 00:14 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-15 00:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-14 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-14 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-14 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-14 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-14 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-13 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-13 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-13 02:54 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-13 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-12 15:34 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-12 15:34 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-12 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-08-12 04:05 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-12 04:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-11 16:45 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-11 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-11 05:25 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63920?
CVE-2026-63920 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: validate extension header length before copying to cmsg ip6datagramrecvspecificctl() builds IPV6_{HOPOPTS,DSTOPTS,RTHDR} cmsgs (and their IPV6_2292* legacy counterparts) by trusting the on-wire hdrlen byte (ptr[1]) when…
When was CVE-2026-63920 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63920 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63920 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63920 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 93.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63920?
CVE-2026-63920 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.1 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63920?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63920, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63920

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63920?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.