CVE-2026-63895

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

usb: gadget: f_fs: copy only received bytes on short ep0 read

ffs_ep0_read() allocates its control-OUT data buffer with kmalloc() (not kzalloc) at the Length value from the Setup packet, then copies that full len to userspace regardless of how many bytes were actually received:

data = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); ... ret = __ffs_ep0_queue_wait(ffs, data, len); if ((ret > 0) && (copy_to_user(buf, data, len))) ret = -EFAULT;

__ffs_ep0_queue_wait() returns req->actual, which on a short control OUT transfer is strictly less than len. The copy_to_user() call still copies len bytes, so on a short OUT the last (len - ret) bytes of the kmalloc() buffer -- uninitialised slab residue -- are delivered to the FunctionFS daemon.

Short ep0 OUT completions are specified USB control-transfer behavior and are produced by in-tree UDCs:

* dwc2 continues on req->actual < req->length for ep0 DATA OUT (short-not-ok is the only ep0-OUT stall path). * aspeed_udc ends ep0 OUT on rx_len < ep->ep.maxpacket. * renesas_usbf logs "ep0 short packet" and completes the request. * dwc3 stalls on short IN but not on short OUT.

A short ep0 OUT is therefore not evidence of a broken UDC; it is a normal condition f_fs has to cope with. The sibling gadgetfs implementation in drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/inode.c already does this correctly via min(len, dev->req->actual) before copy_to_user(). This patch brings f_fs.c to the same safe pattern rather than trimming at a defensive layer.

The bug is reached from the FunctionFS device node, which in real deployments is owned by the privileged gadget daemon (adbd, UMS, composite gadget services, etc.); it is not reachable from unprivileged userspace. Linux host stacks normally reject short-wLength control OUTs before they reach the gadget, so reproducing this required a build that bypasses that host-side check. With the bypass in place, a 1-byte payload on a 64-byte Setup produces 63 bytes of non-canary slab residue in the daemon's read buffer.

Fix by copying only ret (actually received) bytes to userspace.

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
18%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

July 27, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63895(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-30 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-26 13:42 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-26 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-23 06:16 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-23 06:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-19 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-19 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-16 12:21 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-16 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-13 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
Show 49 more
  1. 2026-08-13 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-09 22:12 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-09 22:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-09 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-06 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-06 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-03 08:02 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-03 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-31 00:57 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-07-31 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-07-31 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-28 15:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-07-27 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-07-27 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-26 11:01 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-07-26 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-07-26 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-07-23 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-07-20 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-07-20 17:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-07-19 17:49 UTCNVD update
  48. 2026-07-19 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-07-19 15:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-63895?
CVE-2026-63895 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: usb: gadget: f_fs: copy only received bytes on short ep0 read ffsep0read() allocates its control-OUT data buffer with kmalloc() (not kzalloc) at the Length value from the Setup packet, then copies that full len to userspace…
When was CVE-2026-63895 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63895 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on July 27, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63895 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63895 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 82.4% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63895?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63895, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63895

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63895?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.