CVE-2026-63914

HIGHPre-NVD 7.37.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 7.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns

xfrm_send_migrate() in net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c and pfkey_send_migrate() in net/key/af_key.c both hardcode &init_net for the multicast that announces a successful XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE / SADB_X_MIGRATE.

XFRM_MSG_MIGRATE arrives on a per-netns NETLINK_XFRM socket, and the rest of the xfrm/af_key netlink path was made netns-aware in 2008. The other 14 multicast paths in xfrm_user.c route their event using xs_net(x), xp_net(xp) or sock_net(skb->sk); only the migrate path was missed.

Two consequences of the init_net hardcoding:

  • The notification (selector, old/new endpoint addresses, and the
km_address) is delivered to listeners on init_net's XFRMNLGRP_MIGRATE / pfkey BROADCAST_ALL groups rather than on the issuing netns. An IKE daemon running in init_net therefore receives migration notifications originating from any other netns on the host.
  • An IKE daemon running inside a non-init netns and subscribed
to its own XFRMNLGRP_MIGRATE / pfkey groups never receives the notification of its own migration. IKEv2 MOBIKE / address-update handling inside a netns is silently broken.

Thread struct net through km_migrate() and the xfrm_mgr.migrate function pointer, drop the &init_net override in xfrm_send_migrate() and pfkey_send_migrate(), and pass the caller's net (already in scope in xfrm_migrate() via sock_net(skb->sk)) all the way down. struct xfrm_mgr is in-tree only and not exported as a stable API, so the function-pointer signature change is internal.

pfkey_broadcast() is already netns-aware via net_generic(net, pfkey_net_id) since the pernet conversion. The five other pfkey_broadcast() callers in af_key.c already pass xs_net(x), sock_net(sk) or a per-netns net, so this only removes the &init_net outlier.

CVSS v3
7.3
EG Score
7.3(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity73% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe463798343382c8fe9416a95959f005a3c30aa5
generic

xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bafc7d0774b9bf52909c70ed990bc5ccf7ec4bad
generic

xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a306cf2ac8849c487791369fad6f216399d000f6
generic

xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e2a4f7ca0952820731ef7bdadfc9a9e9d3571b4
generic

xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6df8157547347b5257bf640a0ae3dfc4411e06cd
generic

xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/448bb92ca101dde8a6e88b4dc824044b4e341604
generic

xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/26ce8dbf2e23fe4fcc3351d19ef6d3fb703ed126
generic

xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00f2c451e57df50b1151d9b2254878f106b7c892

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63914(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 32× in last 7d / 165× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 212 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 02:57 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-30 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-27 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-27 23:50 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-27 23:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-27 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-27 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-26 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-26 23:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-26 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-26 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 22:44 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-25 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-25 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-24 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-24 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-24 09:29 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-24 09:29 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-24 09:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-23 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-23 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-23 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-22 22:08 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-22 22:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-22 10:21 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-22 10:21 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-22 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-21 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-21 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-21 10:40 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-21 10:40 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-21 10:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-20 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-20 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-20 10:57 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-20 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-19 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-19 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-19 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-18 21:49 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-18 21:49 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-18 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-18 09:25 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-18 09:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-17 21:10 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-17 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-17 21:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-08-17 08:17 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-17 08:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-16 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-16 20:30 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-16 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-16 08:43 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-16 08:43 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-16 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-15 20:56 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-15 20:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-15 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-15 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-15 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-14 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-14 21:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-14 09:33 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-14 09:33 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-14 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-13 21:46 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-13 21:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-13 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-13 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-12 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-12 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-12 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-12 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-12 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-11 22:39 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-11 22:39 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-11 22:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-11 10:52 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-11 10:52 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63914?
CVE-2026-63914 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: route MIGRATE notifications to caller's netns xfrmsendmigrate() in net/xfrm/xfrmuser.c and pfkeysend_migrate() in net/key/afkey.c both hardcode &initnet for the multicast that announces a successful XFRMMSGMIGRATE /…
When was CVE-2026-63914 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63914 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63914 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63914 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 94.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63914?
CVE-2026-63914 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 7.3 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63914?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63914, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63914

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63914?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.