CVE-2026-64093

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-45778 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

batman-adv: tp_meter: directly shut down timer on cleanup

batadv_tp_sender_cleanup() was calling timer_delete_sync() followed by timer_delete() to guard against the timer handler re-arming itself between the two calls. This double-deletion hack relied on the sending status being set to 0 to suppress re-arming.

Replace both calls with a single timer_shutdown_sync(). This function both waits for any running timer callback to complete (like timer_delete_sync()) and permanently disarms the timer so it cannot be re-armed afterwards, making re-arming prevention unconditional and self-documenting.

The re-arming property is also required because otherwise:

  • context 0 (batadv_tp_recv_ack()) checks in
batadv_tp_reset_sender_timer() if sending is still 1 -> it is
  • context 1 changes in batadv_tp_sender_shutdown() sending to 0 and in
this process forces the kthread to stop timer in batadv_tp_sender_cleanup()
  • context 0 continues in batadv_tp_reset_sender_timer() and rearms the
timer -> but the reference for it is already gone

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
28th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 11, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Jul 20, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

batman-adv: tp_meter: directly shut down timer on cleanup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f86b20ec8d17d77bddc02c5c86cfa2389d84ecff
Web page

batman-adv: tp_meter: directly shut down timer on cleanup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5487249a81ea658717614009c8f46acc5b7101a
Web page

batman-adv: tp_meter: directly shut down timer on cleanup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/933880a8bc9b4042223a79255c0b1021cdc36991
Web page

batman-adv: tp_meter: directly shut down timer on cleanup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/770bf0a35f0620b526fd4193889d1e77084e4c43
Web page

batman-adv: tp_meter: directly shut down timer on cleanup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/74a76634055462833446684fd526d73c290ea43a
Web page

batman-adv: tp_meter: directly shut down timer on cleanup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5bc2d50fb66b46f86543d5153a188eb1486d0b6e
Web page

batman-adv: tp_meter: directly shut down timer on cleanup - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00bf4bb9947b1190a8be8d9b6a1bcbfa3707785c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64093(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(20)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.38) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1118.115) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1118.128~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1114.120~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1063.66) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-fips-6.8 (6.8.0-1070.78+fips1) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-146.146) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1070.78) @ noble2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (6.8.0-1066.67~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-5.15 (5.15.0.1112.112) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1080 (5.15.0-1080.84) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-6.8 (6.8.0-1068.75~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-10-20ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(20)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 320 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 220 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  6. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  7. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  8. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  9. 2026-10-20 18:44 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-20 18:44 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-20 18:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  13. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  14. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  17. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  18. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  19. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  20. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 11:46 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-13 11:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  23. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  4. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  5. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  6. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  7. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  8. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  9. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  10. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  11. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  12. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  13. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  14. 2026-10-01 08:14 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-01 08:14 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-01 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  18. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  19. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-28 07:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  23. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-24 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  26. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  27. 2026-09-23 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-23 01:55 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-23 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  30. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  31. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  32. 2026-09-18 04:14 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-18 04:14 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-18 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  35. 2026-09-17 05:20 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-17 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-17 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  38. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  39. 2026-09-16 12:55 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-16 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-16 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  42. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  43. 2026-09-14 10:56 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-14 10:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  45. 2026-09-13 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-13 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-13 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  48. 2026-09-13 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-13 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-09-12 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-12 19:36 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-12 19:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  53. 2026-09-12 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-12 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  55. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-11 18:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  58. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  59. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  60. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  61. 2026-09-07 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-07 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-07 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  64. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  65. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  66. 2026-09-06 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-06 12:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-09-05 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-05 21:58 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-05 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  71. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  72. 2026-09-05 09:52 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-05 09:52 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-09-05 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qf88-xw8w-824g · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  75. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64093?
CVE-2026-64093 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: batman-adv: tp_meter: directly shut down timer on cleanup batadvtpsendercleanup() was calling timerdelete_sync() followed by timer_delete() to guard against the timer handler re-arming itself between the two calls. This…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64093 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64093 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64093 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64093 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (28th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64093?
CVE-2026-64093 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64093?
A fix for CVE-2026-64093 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64093 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64093

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64093?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.