RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. From 4.0.0 until 4.3.3, 4.2.9, 4.1.14, and 4.0.23, AMQP 1.0 management GET /bindings exposes full binding topology to any authenticated AMQP user without resource/management permission checks. the AMQP 1.0 HTTP-over-AMQP management endpoint GET /bindings (the rabbitamqpmanagement handler) enumerates bindings between an arbitrary source exchange and destination queue/exchange in the caller's virtual host without performing any resource-level permission check. Unlike every sibling operation in the same module (which call checkresourceaccess / bindingchecks), the GET handler ignores the authenticated User and returns the binding list unchanged. As a result, any authenticated AMQP 1.0 client that can open a management link pair , including users with no management/monitoring/policymaker/administrator tag , can enumerate the complete binding topology (source exchanges, destination queues/exchanges, routing keys, and binding arguments) of the virtual host they can access. The equivalent HTTP management API (GET /api/bindings) Confidentiality impact: a non-management AMQP 1.0 user can enumerate the complete routing topology of any virtual host it can connect to , every (source exchange, destination queue/exchange, routing key, binding arguments) This issue is fixed in versions 4.3.3, 4.2.9, 4.1.14, and 4.0.23.
CVE-2026-61837
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (14th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.3
- EG Score
- 6.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 44EG Risk 44/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity63% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 14th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 25, 2026
Last Modified
September 29, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026RabbitMQ 4.3.3
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.3.3
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.3RabbitMQ 4.2.9
Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.9
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.9commit b94004dea530 (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit b94004dea530 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/b94004dea530f961b3dc649d94969b89f1a3183fcommit 341e3f2795eb (rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server)
Fix landed in rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server commit 341e3f2795eb — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/commit/341e3f2795ebd1f816e712530f651a3221d23ad9AMQP 1.0 management `GET /bindings` exposes full binding topology to any authenticated AMQP user without resource/management permission checks · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-w9hf-476r-443xWeakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-03 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 20:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 14:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 18:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:39 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-61837?
When was CVE-2026-61837 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-61837 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61837?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-61837?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-61837
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-61837?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.