jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.15.0 until 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4, Java Records using a PropertyNamingStrategy can bypass @JsonIgnore because POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals() records an ignored component under its original implicit name before _renameUsing() applies the naming strategy, allowing the renamed JSON key to be assigned to the Record constructor parameter. This issue is fixed in versions 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4.
CVE-2026-59888
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 44EG Risk 44/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity65% × 45%The EG Score, 6.5 of 10.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 34th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 14, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jul 15, 2026`@JsonIgnore` on a Record property is bypassed with a PropertyNamingStrategy in jackson-databind [CVE-2026-59888] · Advisory · FasterXML/jackson-databind · GitHub
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5`@JsonIgnore` on Record property ignored with `PropertyNamingStrategy` [CVE-2026-59888]
Fix merged in FasterXML/jackson-databind PR #5974 on 2026-05-07 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/5974commit c7c678360624 (FasterXML/jackson-databind)
Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-databind commit c7c678360624 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/c7c678360624da5bc7eed2152789fa522880db9dcommit baa2cdf5ca2b (FasterXML/jackson-databind)
Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-databind commit baa2cdf5ca2b — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/baa2cdf5ca2b2717fbb88d91955d69d8651df3e4Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-59888(7)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:76043Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.3.7 security update
- RHSA-2026:76041Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Enterprise Linux AI 3.3.7 security update
- RHSA-2026:68699Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Inference Server 3.3.7 (CUDA)
- RHSA-2026:66545Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AMQ Broker 7.13.6 release and security update
- RHSA-2026:62260Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.30.0 Release.
- RHSA-2026:54440Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Lightspeed (formerly Insights) for Runtimes security update
- GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5GitHub Security AdvisoriesMedium
jackson-databind: @JsonIgnore on a Record property is bypassed with a PropertyNamingStrategy
Patch Availability(4)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | rhaiis/vllm-cuda-rhel9:1789582776 | 2026-09-17 | redhat |
| redhat | jackson-databind | 2026-09-10 | redhat |
| redhat | devspaces/server-rhel9:1787757597 | 2026-09-01 | redhat |
| redhat | rh-lightspeed-runtimes/runtimes-agent-init-rhel9:1786378722 | 2026-08-12 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 2.19.0 ... 2.21.3 (13 versions) |
| — |
| tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 3.0.0 ... 3.1.3 (10 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 164 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 64 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-10-01 13:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 13:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
- 2026-09-24 09:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 03:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 03:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-18 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-14 07:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 07:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-13 07:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-08 01:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 01:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-05 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-31 05:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 05:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 05:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 05:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-28 02:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 02:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 01:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-26 01:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
- 2026-08-24 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 22:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 22:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
- 2026-08-22 22:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
- 2026-08-21 23:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
- 2026-08-20 00:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
- 2026-08-18 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 22:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
- 2026-08-17 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 23:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
- 2026-08-16 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 23:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 16th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownMaven:tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:54440 · redhat:RHSA-2026:62260
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-915
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-59888?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-59888 published?
Is CVE-2026-59888 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-59888?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-59888?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-59888
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-59888?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.