CVE-2026-57148

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-78396 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-f38v-77qj-h4jq (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 0.1.6, praisonai_platform/services/auth_service.py falls back to the public dev-secret-change-me HS256 signing key when PLATFORM_JWT_SECRET is unset, while the startup and token-issuance guards are disabled because PLATFORM_ENV also defaults to dev. An unauthenticated attacker can sign a JWT containing an attacker-chosen sub value, and AuthService._verify_token() accepts it as an authenticated identity, enabling user or workspace-owner impersonation when a target identifier is known. This vulnerability is fixed in praisonai-platform 0.1.6.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
50th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 18, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 15, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github_release, github, github_commit.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Incomplete fix of GHSA-3qg8: praisonai-platform 0.1.4 still boots on the hardcoded JWT secret dev-secret-change-me (default-open production guard) · Advisory · MervinPraison/PraisonAI · GitHub

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-f38v-77qj-h4jq
GitHub release Patch Available

PraisonAI v4.6.51

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.51

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/releases/tag/v4.6.51
GitHub pull request Patch Available

fix: harden JWT secret defaults and replace eval() in examples (GHSA-3qg8-5g3r-79v5, GHSA-vg22-4gmj-prxw)

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.150 (PR #1793 merged 2026-06-02)

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/pull/1793
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit e0fb8e7dd1ee (MervinPraison/PraisonAI)

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.150 (contains commit e0fb8e7dd1ee)

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/e0fb8e7dd1ee6759c18ed07f436c21dbd9c20747

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57148(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
praisonai-platform0.1.0, 0.1.1, 0.1.2, 0.1.3, 0.1.4
  • every version up to 0.1.6: fixed in 0.1.6
—

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 22:25 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-24 18:38 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  9. 2026-10-23 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  11. 2026-10-22 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 17:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  17. 2026-10-19 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  22. 2026-10-17 15:48 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  24. 2026-10-16 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
Show 41 more
  1. 2026-10-15 15:03 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-10-14 09:32 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 07:06 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  12. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  14. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  15. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  17. 2026-10-06 11:44 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  20. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  21. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  23. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  24. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  26. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  27. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  28. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  29. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  30. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  31. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  32. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  33. 2026-09-16 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-16 17:53 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  36. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  37. 2026-09-15 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-07-30 22:29 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-07-26 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-07-23 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-07-20 21:32 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-57148?
CVE-2026-57148 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 18, 2026. PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to 0.1.6, praisonaiplatform/services/authservice.py falls back to the public dev-secret-change-me HS256 signing key when PLATFORMJWTSECRET is unset, while the startup and token-issuance guards are disabled because PLATFORMENV also defaults to dev. An…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57148 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-57148 was published on June 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-57148 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-57148 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57148?
CVE-2026-57148 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57148?
A fix for CVE-2026-57148 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-57148 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57148

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57148?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.