PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 of the PraisonAI Platform API have two authorization failures that together break workspace isolation. The service layer for issues and projects performs global primary-key lookups without checking workspace ownership, so any authenticated user can read, modify, and delete resources in any workspace just by swapping UUIDs in their API requests. On top of that, every member management endpoint (add, update role, remove) only requires min_role="member", which lets any workspace member promote themselves to owner and kick out the original owner. A low-privilege member of one workspace can steal data from every other workspace and take over any workspace they belong to. Both issues come from the same gap: the route layer pulls workspace_id from the URL and verifies membership, but the service layer ignores the workspace scope for resource lookups and ignores the caller's role level for member operations. The require_workspace_member() dependency does its job correctly. The problem is that the service layer doesn't use the information it provides. Version 0.1.4 of the PraisonAI Platform API patch the issue.
CVE-2026-48169
This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 83% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8(medium)
- EG Risk
- 56(Track*)EG Risk 56/100SSVC: Track*
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity88% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Watch closely — could escalate to Attend. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 18%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
May 29, 2026
Last Modified
August 11, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 7, 2026advisory-database/vulns/praisonai-platform/PYSEC-2026-2935.yaml at main · pypa/advisory-database · GitHub
https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/praisonai-platform/PYSEC-2026-2935.yamlCross-Workspace IDOR and Privilege Escalation in Platform API · Advisory · MervinPraison/PraisonAI · GitHub
https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-gv23-xrm3-8c62Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-48169(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| praisonai-platform | 0.1.0, 0.1.1, 0.1.2, 0.1.3 | 0.1.4 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 04:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 23:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 10:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 06:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 05:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 20 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-14 00:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 22:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 13:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 22:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-31 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-05-29 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-48169?
When was CVE-2026-48169 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-48169 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-48169?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-48169?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-48169
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-48169?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.