CVE-2026-49099

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-06. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Salesforce Component.

The camel-salesforce producer resolves its operation parameters - the SOQL query, the SOSL search, the target SObject name and id, the Apex REST URL and method, and the Apex query parameters - from Exchange message headers, reading the header in preference to the value configured on the endpoint (AbstractSalesforceProcessor.getParameter() reads the header first and uses the endpoint configuration only as a fallback). The control-header constants in SalesforceEndpointConfig (for example SOBJECT_QUERY = sObjectQuery, SOBJECT_SEARCH = sObjectSearch, SOBJECT_NAME = sObjectName, SOBJECT_ID = sObjectId, APEX_URL = apexUrl, APEX_METHOD = apexMethod, and the apexQueryParam. prefix) used plain, non-Camel-prefixed values. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a salesforce: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set these headers and override what the route intended - supplying its own SOQL query or SOSL search to read data from any SObject the connected Salesforce user can access, overriding the target SObject name and id for CRUD operations, or redirecting an Apex REST call to a different endpoint and HTTP method (including destructive methods) with injected query parameters. All such operations run with the full permissions of the Salesforce connected (integration) user, which is typically broad. No credentials are required from the attacker when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set Salesforce operation parameters via the raw header names must use the CamelSalesforce* names (for example CamelSalesforceSObjectQuery and CamelSalesforceApexUrl) instead of the old sObject* / apex* values; the endpoint-option spelling is unchanged. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Salesforce control headers from any untrusted ingress before the salesforce: producer (for example removeHeaders('sObject*') and removeHeaders('apex*') at the start of the route), and set the query, SObject and Apex parameters from a trusted source.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
The EG Score, 5.3 of 10.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
42nd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 6, 2026

Last Modified

July 8, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 8, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2026-49099: Apache Camel: Camel-Salesforce: Non-Camel-prefixed Exchange header constants (sObjectQuery, sObjectSearch, apexUrl, ...) bypass the HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to inject SOQL/SOSL queries, override the target SObject, and redirect Apex REST calls using t

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/07/05/24
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-49099 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-49099.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-49099(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.camel:camel-salesforce4.19.0, 4.20.0
  • 4.0.0 up to 4.14.8: fixed in 4.14.8
  • 4.15.0 up to 4.18.3: fixed in 4.18.3
  • 4.19.0 up to 4.21.0: fixed in 4.21.0
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 171 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 71 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-11 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  14. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  15. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  16. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  17. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  18. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  19. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  20. 2026-09-23 06:26 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  22. 2026-09-18 06:05 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  24. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  25. 2026-09-14 11:41 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  2. 2026-09-13 11:56 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-12 13:39 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  5. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  6. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  7. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  8. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  9. 2026-09-05 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  11. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  12. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  13. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  14. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  15. 2026-08-30 08:27 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  17. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  18. 2026-08-27 22:00 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-27 22:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  20. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  21. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  22. 2026-08-26 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-26 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  24. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  25. 2026-08-24 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-24 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  27. 2026-08-23 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-23 19:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  29. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  30. 2026-08-22 21:05 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-22 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  32. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  33. 2026-08-21 22:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  34. 2026-08-21 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-08-21 00:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  36. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  37. 2026-08-20 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-20 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  39. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  40. 2026-08-18 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-18 20:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  42. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  43. 2026-08-17 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-17 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  45. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  46. 2026-08-16 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-16 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  48. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  49. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  50. 2026-08-16 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  51. 2026-08-15 01:52 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-15 01:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  53. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  54. 2026-08-14 03:41 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-14 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  56. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  57. 2026-08-13 05:32 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-13 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  59. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  60. 2026-08-12 07:21 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-12 07:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  62. 2026-08-11 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-11 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  64. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  65. 2026-08-10 10:59 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-10 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  67. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  68. 2026-08-09 12:47 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-09 12:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  70. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  71. 2026-08-08 14:37 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-08-08 14:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  73. 2026-08-07 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  74. 2026-08-06 18:16 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-06 18:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gcc7-c8mp-34qx · GitHub CVSS 5.3

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-49099?
CVE-2026-49099 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 6, 2026. Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Salesforce Component. The camel-salesforce producer resolves its operation parameters - the SOQL query, the SOSL search,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-49099 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-49099 was published on July 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-49099 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-49099 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (42nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-49099?
CVE-2026-49099 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.3 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-49099?
A fix for CVE-2026-49099 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-49099 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-49099

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-49099?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.