CVE-2026-46585

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-06. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Lucene Component.

The camel-lucene producer reads the search phrase from an Exchange header (LuceneConstants.HEADER_QUERY) whose value was the plain string QUERY (and RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS for HEADER_RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS). Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that exposes a Lucene query operation behind an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http), any HTTP client could therefore set the QUERY header and have its value executed against the full-text index, overriding the query the route intended to run. Depending on what is indexed, this allows reading documents the request should not have access to (for example a match-all query returns the entire index, or the route's intended per-user filter can be replaced), and expensive regular-expression queries can consume significant CPU. No credentials are required when the HTTP consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set the query via the raw header name must use CamelLuceneQuery (and CamelLuceneReturnLuceneDocs) instead of QUERY / RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the attacker-controllable headers before the Lucene producer and set the query from a trusted source (for example removeHeader('QUERY') and removeHeader('RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS'), then setHeader('QUERY', constant(...)) at the start of the route).

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.5 of 10.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
48th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 6, 2026

Last Modified

July 8, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 7, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2026-46585: Apache Camel: Camel-Lucene: The query control headers used non-Camel-prefixed names (QUERY, RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS) that bypass the HTTP header filter, allowing an HTTP client to inject the full-text search query

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/07/05/12
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-46585 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-46585.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46585(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.camel:camel-lucene4.19.0, 4.20.0
  • 4.0.0 up to 4.14.8: fixed in 4.14.8
  • 4.15.0 up to 4.18.3: fixed in 4.18.3
  • 4.19.0 up to 4.21.0: fixed in 4.21.0
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 215 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 115 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  6. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  8. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  10. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  12. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  14. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  15. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  17. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  18. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  20. 2026-09-23 06:26 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-09-18 06:05 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  24. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  25. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-13 23:57 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  3. 2026-09-13 08:45 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-09-12 13:39 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  8. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  10. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  11. 2026-09-06 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  13. 2026-09-05 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  15. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  16. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  17. 2026-08-30 20:03 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  19. 2026-08-30 08:29 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  21. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  22. 2026-08-27 22:00 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-27 22:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  24. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  25. 2026-08-27 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-27 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  27. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  28. 2026-08-26 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-26 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  30. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  31. 2026-08-25 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  32. 2026-08-24 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-24 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  34. 2026-08-24 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  35. 2026-08-23 17:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  36. 2026-08-23 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-23 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  38. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  39. 2026-08-22 18:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  40. 2026-08-22 04:50 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-22 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  42. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  43. 2026-08-21 17:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  44. 2026-08-21 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-21 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  46. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  47. 2026-08-20 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  48. 2026-08-20 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-20 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  50. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  51. 2026-08-19 10:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  52. 2026-08-18 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-18 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  54. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  55. 2026-08-18 11:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  56. 2026-08-17 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-17 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  58. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  59. 2026-08-17 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-08-16 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-16 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  62. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  63. 2026-08-16 08:58 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-16 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  65. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  66. 2026-08-15 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  67. 2026-08-15 09:55 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-15 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  69. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  70. 2026-08-14 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  71. 2026-08-14 10:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  72. 2026-08-13 23:20 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-13 23:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  74. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  75. 2026-08-13 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-566h-v38h-3xp3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46585?
CVE-2026-46585 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 6, 2026. Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Lucene Component. The camel-lucene producer reads the search phrase from an Exchange header (LuceneConstants.HEADERQUERY) whose value was the plain string QUERY (and RETURNLUCENEDOCS for…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-46585 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-46585 was published on July 6, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-46585 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46585 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46585?
CVE-2026-46585 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46585?
A fix for CVE-2026-46585 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-46585 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46585

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46585?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.