Vulnerability in Oracle Java SE (component: Scripting). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u491, 8u491-perf and 11.0.31. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Java SE accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Java SE accessible data. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. This vulnerability also applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
CVE-2026-47058
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 7.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-22. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.4; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-46544 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.4
- EG Score
- 7.4HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 33EG Risk 33/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity74% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 32nd
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 21, 2026
Last Modified
October 24, 2026
References (1)
- secalert_us@oraclehttps://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2026.htmlVendor Advisory
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-47058(9)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:52949Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: java-1.8.0-ibm security update
- RHSA-2026:42877Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: java-1.8.0-openjdk security update
- RHSA-2026:42876Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: java-1.8.0-openjdk security update
- RHSA-2026:42878Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenJDK 8u502 Security Update for Portable Linux Builds
- RHSA-2026:42879Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenJDK 8u502 Windows Security Update
- RHSA-2026:42882Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenJDK 11.0.32 ELS Security Update for Windows Builds
- RHSA-2026:42881Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenJDK 11.0.32 ELS Security Update for Portable Linux Builds
- RHSA-2026:42880Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Java 11 OpenJDK ELS Security Update
- +1 more
Patch Availability(10)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | openjdk-8-source (8u502-ga~us1-0ubuntu1~20.04) @ focal | 2026-10-24 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | openjdk-11-source (11.0.32+9-1ubuntu1~18.04) @ bionic | 2026-10-24 | ubuntu |
| redhat | java-1.8.0-ibm-1:1.8.0.8.70-1.el8_10 | 2026-08-10 | redhat |
| redhat | java-11-openjdk-windows | 2026-07-23 | redhat |
| redhat | java-11-openjdk-1:11.0.32.0.9-1.el9 | 2026-07-23 | redhat |
| redhat | java-11-openjdk-portable | 2026-07-23 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.8.0-openjdk-portable | 2026-07-23 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.8.0-openjdk-windows | 2026-07-23 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.502.b07-1.1.el7_9 | 2026-07-23 | redhat |
| redhat | java-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.502.b07-1.1.el9 | 2026-07-23 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| openjdk-11 | 11.0.12+7-2 ... 11.0.32~8ea-1 (72 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(2)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 348 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 248 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-17 12:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-17 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:02 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-04 13:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 13:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-04 13:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-01 07:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 07:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-01 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-28 06:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 06:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-28 06:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-24 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-24 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-23 01:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 01:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-23 01:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-20 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 05:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-20 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-19 00:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 00:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-09-18 03:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 03:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-17 05:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-16 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-14 10:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-13 22:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 22:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 22:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-13 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-12 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-12 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 09:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-11 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 20:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-09-11 08:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 08:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 08:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownDebian:11:openjdk-11
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:42876 · redhat:RHSA-2026:42880
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-502
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-47058?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-47058 published?
Is CVE-2026-47058 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47058?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47058?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-47058
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47058?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.