The TIFF decoder does not place a limit on the size of PackBits-compressed data. A maliciously-crafted image can exploit this to cause a small image (both in terms of pixel width/height and encoded size) to make the decoder decode large amounts of compressed data.
CVE-2026-46599
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 71% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(medium)
- EG Risk
- 49(Track)EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 29%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
May 29, 2026
Last Modified
July 22, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Jun 5, 2026x/image/tiff: excessive resource consumption in PackBits decompression · Issue #79577 · golang/go · GitHub
https://go.dev/issue/79577Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46599(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | cryostat/cryostat-storage-rhel9:4.2.0-19 | 2026-07-29 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-golang-x-image | 0.0~git20200119.58c2397-1 ... 0.9.0-1 (22 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-golang-x-image | 0.11.0-1 ... 0.9.0-1 (17 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-golang-x-image | 0.18.0-1 ... 0.45.0-1 (7 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang-golang-x-image | 0.18.0-1 ... 0.45.0-1 (7 versions) | — | — |
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| golang.org/x/image | — | 0.41.0 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 35× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 180 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 06:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 06:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 04:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 14:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 14:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 14:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 23:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 23:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 10:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 10:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 06:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 07:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 07:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 18:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 12:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 00:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 00:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 03:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 14:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 14:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 02:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 00:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 12:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 23:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 11:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 22:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 22:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 10:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 21:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 09:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 23:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 23:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 04:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 16:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-03 03:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 15:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-02 02:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-01 13:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-31 19:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-31 05:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-31 05:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-29 11:48 UTCEG score recompute
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-46599?
When was CVE-2026-46599 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-46599 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46599?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46599?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46599
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46599?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.