In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.13.2 up to and including 1.25.1, stub or forward zones where the name is below an intermediate labed below a DNSSEC signed zone could be shadowed by the intermediate label's secure NXDOMAIN answer from the parent. This is caused by an off-by-one error in 'harden-below-nxdomain' logic; enabled by default. It effectively bypasses the configuration and the configured stub/forward zone is never contacted. 'harden-below-nxdomain' does an upward DNS cache walk together with a delegation point guard that does not allow NXDOMAIN synthesis above stub/forward zones. The guard tests the domain name but before stripping a label. This results in an iteration where the domain name equals the configured stub/forward zone apex that passes the guard, strips one more label, and probes the cache at the apex's immediate public parent. If that parent has a cached DNSSEC-secure NXDOMAIN, which it will for any private namespace nested two or more labels under a signed public name, the walk returns it and the configured stub/forward upstream is never contacted. This can only be triggered by the query for the intermediate label (between the stub/forward apex and the DNSSEC parent zone).
CVE-2026-44687
Score 3.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-07-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 3.7; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 3.7
- EG Score
- 3.7(medium)
- EG Risk
- 17(Track)EG Risk 17/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity37% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 12%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 22, 2026
Last Modified
July 24, 2026
References (1)
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-44687(3)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- CVE-2026-44687Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Low
Off-by-one error in 'harden-below-nxdomain' logic can shadow a stub/forward zone by a legitimate parent's NXDOMAIN
- GHSA-x324-pxwv-r76hGitHub Security AdvisoriesLow
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.13.2 up to and including 1.25.1, stub or forward zones where the name is...
- RHSA-2026:43588Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | unbound-main-1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 2026-07-22 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | — | 1.25.2-r0 | — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.13.1-1 ... 1.25.2-1 (47 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.17.1-2 ... 1.26.0-2 (25 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.22.0-2 ... 1.26.0-2 (15 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.22.0-2 ... 1.25.1-1 (9 versions) | 1.25.2-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 102 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 06:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 06:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 21:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 00:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 13:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 13:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-23 10:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 10:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 10:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 06:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 03:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 03:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-13 23:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 23:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 20:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-07 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-07 17:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 17:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 13:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 13:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 13:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-01 10:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-01 10:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-01 10:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-29 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-29 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-29 06:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 03:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 03:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-44687?
When was CVE-2026-44687 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-44687 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-44687?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-44687?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-44687
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-44687?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.