In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.23.0 up to and including 1.25.1, when 'dns-error-reporting: yes' is set, the EDNS Report-Channel option (code 18) from the last upstream response is read and uses the option's length as the length of the agent domain. When a domain name check is performed on the agent domain, the returned lenght is not used and if the agent domain is followed by garbage, those bytes are moved onto the tail of the synthetic '_er.' report query name. That query name is later used in the iterator via a subquery to send out the DNS Error Report and when Unbound tries to walk that query name during 'find_closest_of_type()', it strips labels using the query name length rather than stopping at the embedded root, walks one byte past it, and feeds the first garbage byte to 'dname_query_hash()' as a label length writing over the stack variable 'labuf'. One ordinary upstream response from a delegated zone the attacker controls is sufficient to terminate the daemon.
CVE-2026-55973
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 49(Track)EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 22%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 22, 2026
Last Modified
July 24, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jul 22, 2026Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55973(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:55892Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: unbound security update
- RHSA-2026:55841Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: unbound security update
- CVE-2026-55973Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Medium
'dns-error-reporting: yes' leads to stack buffer overflow
- GHSA-g479-fg97-pf5wGitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.23.0 up to and including 1.25.1, when 'dns-error-reporting: yes' is set,...
- RHSA-2026:43588Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | unbound-0:1.24.2-3.el9_8.4 | 2026-08-17 | redhat |
| redhat | unbound-0:1.24.2-7.el10_2.4 | 2026-08-17 | redhat |
| redhat | unbound-main-1.25.2-0.1.hum1 | 2026-07-22 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | — | 1.25.2-r0 | — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.13.1-1 ... 1.25.2-1 (47 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.17.1-2 ... 1.25.2-1 (23 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.22.0-2 ... 1.25.2-1 (13 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| unbound | 1.22.0-2 ... 1.25.1-1 (9 versions) | 1.25.2-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 40× in last 7d / 157× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 157 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-08-20 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 10:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 22:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 10:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-18 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 20:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 05:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-17 05:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 17:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 04:45 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-08-16 04:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-16 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-15 04:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-15 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-15 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-14 15:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-14 03:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-14 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-14 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-13 15:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 15:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-13 02:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-13 02:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 14:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-12 14:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 14:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-12 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-12 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 14:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 14:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 14:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 01:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-11 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-11 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-10 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 13:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-10 01:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-10 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-10 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-09 12:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 12:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-09 00:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-09 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-08 12:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-08 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-08 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-08 00:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-07 11:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-07 11:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-06 23:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 23:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-06 11:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-06 11:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-05 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-05 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-05 10:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-05 10:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-04 22:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-04 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-04 09:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-04 09:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-03 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-03 21:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 21:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-03 08:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-03 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-02 20:41 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-0011EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2001-0013EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-20
- CVE-2005-0050EG 10.0EPSS p99HIGH
- CVE-2004-1019EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2004-0840EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2003-1425EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2003-1487EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2002-1874EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2002-2236EG 10.0EPSS p91HIGH
- CVE-2002-2365EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2002-1358EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2002-1359EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-55973?
When was CVE-2026-55973 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-55973 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55973?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55973?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55973
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55973?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.