CVE-2026-64047

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. the CNA's CVSS baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring

When an sk_msg scatterlist ring wraps (sg.end < sg.start), tls_push_record() chains the tail portion of the ring to the head using sg_chain(). An extra entry in the sg array is reserved for this:

struct sk_msg_sg { [...] /* The extra two elements: * 1) used for chaining the front and sections when the list becomes * partitioned (e.g. end < start). The crypto APIs require the * chaining; * 2) to chain tailer SG entries after the message. */ struct scatterlist data[MAX_MSG_FRAGS + 2];

The current code uses MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 as the ring size:

sg_chain(&msg_pl->sg.data[msg_pl->sg.start], MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_pl->sg.start + 1, msg_pl->sg.data);

This places the chain pointer at

sg_chain(data[start], (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_start + 1) .. = &data[start] + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - msg_start + 1) - 1 = data[start + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - start + 1) - 1] = data[MAX_SKB_FRAGS]

instead of the true last entry. This is likely due to a "race" of the commit under Fixes landing close to commit 031097d9e079 ("bpf: sk_msg, zap ingress queue on psock down")

Convert to ARRAY_SIZE and drop the data[start] / - start (as suggested by Sabrina).

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
42%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 26, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/285943c6e7ca309bbea84b253745154241d9788a
generic

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2fb0dc7e0099686c4e9d2732745d8a31b18c3628
generic

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eca989eab4b2599dcb02f72140a7c08f08838520
generic

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/66339b71f105e6f83e0da3b9583d95077534fe1d
generic

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/131ef12057d92b77b636321b7849c69222405a97
generic

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/84158c2997159df4a0d70cd9c46774512d32a522
generic

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/47110c3a9ac247b688657337f5981efcfcb240dc
generic

net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/73963a375885d5ccb7def39fd0b4f542e0f343dd

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64047(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)5.10.259-1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)6.1.176-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (138 versions)7.0.12-1

All Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 64× in last 7d / 399× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 497 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-30 06:30 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-30 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-28 01:42 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-28 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-27 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-27 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-27 11:49 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-27 11:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-27 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-27 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-26 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-26 22:19 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-26 22:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-26 11:42 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-26 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-26 07:23 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-26 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-26 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-26 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-25 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-25 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-25 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-25 18:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-25 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-25 13:21 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-25 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-25 09:43 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-25 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-25 06:03 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-25 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-25 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-25 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-24 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-24 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-24 19:03 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-24 19:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-24 15:06 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-24 15:06 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-24 15:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-24 11:26 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-24 11:26 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-24 11:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-24 07:46 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-24 07:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-24 03:43 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-24 03:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-23 23:35 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-23 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-23 19:57 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-23 19:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-23 16:18 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-23 16:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-23 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-23 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-23 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-23 08:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-23 05:10 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-23 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-23 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-23 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-23 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-22 21:52 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-22 21:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-22 18:13 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-22 18:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-22 14:34 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-22 14:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-22 10:52 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-22 10:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-22 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-22 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-22 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-22 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-21 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-21 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-21 23:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-08-21 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-21 20:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-21 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-21 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-21 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-21 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-21 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-21 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-21 05:10 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-21 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-21 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-21 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-21 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64047?
CVE-2026-64047 is a critical vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: tls: fix off-by-one in sgchain entry count for wrapped skmsg ring When an sk_msg scatterlist ring wraps (sg.end < sg.start), tlspushrecord() chains the tail portion of the ring to the head using sg_chain(). An extra entry in…
When was CVE-2026-64047 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64047 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64047 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64047 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 58.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64047?
CVE-2026-64047 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64047?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64047, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64047

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64047?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.