CVE-2026-43866

HIGHPre-NVD 7.37.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-06. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel, Apache Camel JMS component.

JmsBinding.extractBodyFromJms() in camel-jms - and the equivalent JmsBinding in camel-sjms - deserializes the payload of an incoming JMS ObjectMessage via jakarta.jms.ObjectMessage.getObject() whenever the mapJmsMessage option is enabled (the default) and Camel acts as a JMS consumer. The CVE-2026-40860 hardening added a post-deserialization class check that rejects classes outside the default allow-list java.;javax.;org.apache.camel.;!*. However org.apache.camel.support.DefaultExchangeHolder itself lives in the allow-listed org.apache.camel. namespace, so an ObjectMessage whose top-level object is a DefaultExchangeHolder passes the check. The receiving side then calls DefaultExchangeHolder.unmarshal() on it without requiring the transferExchange option to be enabled - an asymmetric trust boundary, since the sending side gates ObjectMessage and transferExchange handling but the receiving side did not - writing every non-null field of the holder into the Exchange: the message body, the IN and OUT headers, the exchange properties, the variables, the exchange id and the exception. An attacker who can publish an ObjectMessage to a queue or topic consumed by an affected Camel application can therefore inject arbitrary Exchange state using only universally-trusted java.lang and java.util types, with no deserialization gadget chain required, to manipulate routing and headers, exchange properties and error handling. The same handling applies to camel-sjms and camel-sjms2, and to the JMS-family components built on JmsComponent and JmsBinding: camel-amqp, camel-activemq and camel-activemq6. This is a bypass of the CVE-2026-40860 fix rather than a flaw in it. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0; Apache Camel: from 3.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, JMS ObjectMessage handling is disabled by default in camel-jms, camel-sjms and the JMS-family components (a new objectMessageEnabled option defaults to false at the component and endpoint level), so an incoming ObjectMessage - including a DefaultExchangeHolder payload - is no longer deserialized unless the option is explicitly enabled; only set objectMessageEnabled=true when the consumed JMS destination is fed exclusively by trusted producers. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, restrict publish access to the queues and topics consumed by Camel to trusted producers via JMS broker authorization, and do not expose JMS consumers that map ObjectMessage bodies to untrusted networks; a JMS-provider deserialization allow-list does not mitigate this specific bypass because the crafted payload uses only universally-trusted classes.

CVSS v3
7.3
EG Score
7.3(medium)
EG Risk
48(Track)
EG Risk 48/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity73% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
48%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 6, 2026

Last Modified

July 7, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Jul 7, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-43866 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-43866.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43866(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatcamel-jms2026-08-13redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 1 ecosystem)
Maven(6)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
org.apache.camel:camel-activemq3.0.0 ... 4.9.0 (133 versions)4.14.8
org.apache.camel:camel-activemq64.10.0 ... 4.9.0 (33 versions)4.14.8
org.apache.camel:camel-amqp3.0.0 ... 4.9.0 (136 versions)4.14.8
org.apache.camel:camel-jms3.0.0 ... 4.9.0 (136 versions)4.14.8
org.apache.camel:camel-sjms3.0.0 ... 4.9.0 (136 versions)4.14.8
org.apache.camel:camel-sjms23.0.0 ... 4.9.0 (136 versions)4.14.8

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 134× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 192 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-27 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-27 21:59 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-27 02:27 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-27 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-26 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-26 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-26 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-25 12:02 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-25 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-24 22:35 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-24 22:35 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-24 22:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-24 10:03 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-24 10:03 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-24 10:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-23 19:25 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-23 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-23 06:54 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-23 06:54 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-23 06:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-22 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-08-22 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-22 05:49 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-22 05:49 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-22 05:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-21 17:04 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-21 17:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-21 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-21 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-21 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-20 15:49 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-20 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-20 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-20 02:34 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-20 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-19 09:50 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-19 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-18 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-18 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-18 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-18 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-18 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-17 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-17 15:56 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-17 15:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-17 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-17 03:25 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-17 03:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-16 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-16 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-16 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-16 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-15 13:52 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-15 13:52 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-08-15 13:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-08-15 01:21 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-15 01:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-14 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-14 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-14 00:19 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-14 00:19 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-14 00:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-08-13 11:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-12 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-12 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-12 10:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-11 22:13 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-11 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-11 09:42 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-11 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-08-10 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-10 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-09 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-08-09 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-09 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-08 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-08-08 19:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-08 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-07 18:04 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-07 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43866?
CVE-2026-43866 is a high vulnerability published on July 6, 2026. Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel, Apache Camel JMS component. JmsBinding.extractBodyFromJms() in camel-jms - and the equivalent JmsBinding in camel-sjms - deserializes the payload of an incoming JMS ObjectMessage via jakarta.jms.ObjectMessage.getObject() whenever the…
When was CVE-2026-43866 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43866 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 6, 2026, with the most recent update on July 7, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43866 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43866 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 51.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43866?
CVE-2026-43866 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.3 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43866?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43866, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43866

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43866?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.