BabelDOC is a document translation tool. Prior to 0.6.3, BabelDOC's vendored PDF parser in babeldoc/pdfminer/cmapdb.py deserializes untrusted pickle data when CMapDB._load_data() loads CMap files. PDF-controlled Encoding or CMapName values and embedded PostScript usecmap operators can reach this sink after path separators are decoded, while _normalize_cmap_name() removes only a leading slash. Absolute paths or traversal sequences can escape the trusted CMap directories through os.path.join(), select an attacker-writable .pickle.gz file, and cause pickle.loads() to execute arbitrary Python code with the privileges of the BabelDOC process. This issue is fixed in version 0.6.3.
CVE-2026-54071
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (30th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.8
- EG Score
- 7.8HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 35EG Risk 35/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity78% × 45%The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 30th
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 10, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Aug 21, 2026Arbitrary Code Execution via CMap Pickle Deserialization in babeldoc/pdfminer/cmapdb.py · Advisory · funstory-ai/BabelDOC · GitHub
https://github.com/funstory-ai/BabelDOC/security/advisories/GHSA-m8gf-v64p-gfmgv0.6.3
Patch available: funstory-ai/BabelDOC v0.6.3
https://github.com/funstory-ai/BabelDOC/releases/tag/v0.6.3commit 28f784ca6b43 (funstory-ai/BabelDOC)
Patch available: funstory-ai/BabelDOC v0.6.3 (contains commit 28f784ca6b43)
https://github.com/funstory-ai/BabelDOC/commit/28f784ca6b437dbba040bfd9c67110373cd0924bBabelDOC/docs/release-notes/v0.6.3.md at main · funstory-ai/BabelDOC · GitHub
https://github.com/funstory-ai/BabelDOC/blob/main/docs/release-notes/v0.6.3.mdVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-54071(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| babeldoc | 0.1.10 ... 0.6.2 (184 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-30 20:04 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-28 09:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
Show 43 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-24 11:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-23 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-18 05:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-13 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-12 02:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-08 02:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-05 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-08-30 06:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 21:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-08-27 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-08-26 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-08-24 21:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 09:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 09:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
- 2026-08-21 22:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 21:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 19:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-30 11:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 12:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 20:12 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-54071?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-54071 published?
Is CVE-2026-54071 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54071?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54071?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-54071
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54071?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.