CVE-2026-43402

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-05-08. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

kthread: consolidate kthread exit paths to prevent use-after-free

Guillaume reported crashes via corrupted RCU callback function pointers during KUnit testing. The crash was traced back to the pidfs rhashtable conversion which replaced the 24-byte rb_node with an 8-byte rhash_head in struct pid, shrinking it from 160 to 144 bytes.

struct kthread (without CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP) is also 144 bytes. With CONFIG_SLAB_MERGE_DEFAULT and SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN both round up to 192 bytes and share the same slab cache. struct pid.rcu.func and struct kthread.affinity_node both sit at offset 0x78.

When a kthread exits via make_task_dead() it bypasses kthread_exit() and misses the affinity_node cleanup. free_kthread_struct() frees the memory while the node is still linked into the global kthread_affinity_list. A subsequent list_del() by another kthread writes through dangling list pointers into the freed and reused memory, corrupting the pid's rcu.func pointer.

Instead of patching free_kthread_struct() to handle the missed cleanup, consolidate all kthread exit paths. Turn kthread_exit() into a macro that calls do_exit() and add kthread_do_exit() which is called from do_exit() for any task with PF_KTHREAD set. This guarantees that kthread-specific cleanup always happens regardless of the exit path - make_task_dead(), direct do_exit(), or kthread_exit().

Replace __to_kthread() with a new tsk_is_kthread() accessor in the public header. Export do_exit() since module code using the kthread_exit() macro now needs it directly.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
38%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 8, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 2, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

kthread: consolidate kthread exit paths to prevent use-after-free - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/28aaa9c39945b7925a1cc1d513c8f21ed38f5e4f
generic

kthread: consolidate kthread exit paths to prevent use-after-free - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5a591d7a5e48d30100943940a30a6ab41b15c672
generic

kthread: consolidate kthread exit paths to prevent use-after-free - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4729c7b00a347fd37d0cbc265b85f2884c3e06b6

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43402(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (119 versions)6.19.10-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 127× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 344 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-23 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-23 19:08 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-23 19:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-17 11:32 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-17 11:32 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-17 11:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-16 12:21 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-16 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-16 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-16 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-16 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-16 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-16 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-15 02:28 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-15 02:28 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-15 02:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-14 22:36 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-14 22:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-14 18:43 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-14 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-14 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-14 14:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-14 10:56 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-14 10:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-14 07:03 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-14 07:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-14 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-14 03:09 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-14 03:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-13 08:20 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-13 08:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-13 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-13 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-13 00:30 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-13 00:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-12 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-12 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-12 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-12 16:44 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-12 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-11 23:37 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-11 23:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-11 19:45 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-11 19:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-11 15:52 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-11 15:52 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-11 15:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-11 09:04 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-11 09:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-11 05:10 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-11 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-11 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-11 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-11 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-10 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-10 13:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-10 09:46 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-10 09:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-10 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-10 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-10 02:00 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-10 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-09 22:07 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-09 22:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-09 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-09 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-09 14:22 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-08-09 14:22 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-08-09 14:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-09 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-09 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-09 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-09 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-09 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-08-09 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-09 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43402?
CVE-2026-43402 is a critical vulnerability published on May 8, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kthread: consolidate kthread exit paths to prevent use-after-free Guillaume reported crashes via corrupted RCU callback function pointers during KUnit testing. The crash was traced back to the pidfs rhashtable conversion which…
When was CVE-2026-43402 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43402 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 8, 2026, with the most recent update on August 5, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43402 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43402 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 61.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43402?
CVE-2026-43402 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43402?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43402, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43402

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43402?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.