A flaw was found in gnutls. An off-by-one error exists in the PKCS#12 bag element bounds check. This vulnerability allows an remote attacker to write past the internal array of a PKCS#12 bag when appending to a bag that already contains 32 elements. This memory corruption could lead to a denial of service (DoS) or potentially other unspecified impacts.
CVE-2026-42015
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-27. A secondary CVSS source baseline 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-32012 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 39EG Risk 39/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity53% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.9% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 54th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
May 26, 2026
Last Modified
October 14, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Jun 16, 20262467678 – (CVE-2026-42015) CVE-2026-42015 gnutls: gnutls: Memory corruption due to off-by-one error in PKCS#12 bag handling
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2467678cve-details
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42015Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20613Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20612Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20611Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-42015(20)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:82888Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.17.2
- RHSA-2026:82857Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
- RHSA-2026:82372Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
- RHSA-2026:82354Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
- RHSA-2026:82347Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.18.2
- RHSA-2026:82322Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.17.2
- RHSA-2026:82304Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: cert-manager Operator for Red Hat OpenShift 1.17.2
- RHSA-2026:74674Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat AI Base Images 3.4.3 (Neuron)
- +12 more
Patch Availability(24)
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(9 across 9 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.20(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnutls | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.21(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnutls | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.22(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnutls | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.23(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnutls | — |
| — |
Alpine:v3.24(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnutls | — |
| — |
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnutls28 | 3.7.1-5 ... 3.7.1-5+deb11u9 (10 versions) |
| — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnutls28 | 3.7.9-2 ... 3.7.9-2+deb12u6 (7 versions) |
| — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnutls28 | 3.8.9-3, 3.8.9-3+deb13u1, 3.8.9-3+deb13u2, 3.8.9-3+deb13u3 |
| — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| gnutls28 | 3.8.10-1 ... 3.8.9-3 (11 versions) |
| — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(7)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
- Microsoft MSRCCVE-2026-420152026-05-31
Gnutls: gnutls: memory corruption due to off-by-one error in pkcs#12 bag handling
- Red HatRHSA-2026:13274MODERATE2026-04-29
RHSA-2026:13274 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:20611MODERATE2026-04-29
RHSA-2026:20611 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:20612MODERATE2026-04-29
RHSA-2026:20612 — Moderate
- Red HatRHSA-2026:20613MODERATE2026-04-29
RHSA-2026:20613 — Moderate
- UbuntuUSN-8284-1MEDIUM
GnuTLS vulnerabilities
- UbuntuUSN-8539-1MEDIUM
GnuTLS vulnerabilities
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 343 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 243 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-27 14:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-14 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-14 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 19:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-14 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-14 03:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 03:37 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-14 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-13 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-13 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-13 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-12 16:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 19:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 14:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-10-02 03:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-02 02:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 02:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-10-02 02:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-29 01:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-29 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-29 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
- 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-14 09:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 09:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 09:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-09-01 13:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 13:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-01 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-31 16:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 16:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 16:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-45p2-c2m2-2656 · GitHub CVSS 5.3
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownAlpine:v3.20:gnutls
Same vendor
10 shownredhat:RHSA-2026:13274
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-42015?
When was CVE-2026-42015 made public?
Is CVE-2026-42015 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-42015?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-42015?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-42015
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-42015?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.