CVE-2026-46066

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails

move_dirty_folio_in_page_array() may fail if the file is encrypted, the dirty folio is not the first in the batch, and it fails to allocate a bounce buffer to hold the ciphertext. When that happens, ceph_process_folio_batch() simply redirties the folio and flushes the current batch -- it can retry that folio in a future batch.

However, if this failed folio is not contiguous with the last folio that did make it into the batch, then ceph_process_folio_batch() has already incremented ceph_wbc->num_ops; because it doesn't follow through and add the discontiguous folio to the array, ceph_submit_write() -- which expects that ceph_wbc->num_ops accurately reflects the number of contiguous ranges (and therefore the required number of "write extent" ops) in the writeback -- will panic the kernel:

BUG_ON(ceph_wbc->op_idx + 1 != req->r_num_ops);

This issue can be reproduced on affected kernels by writing to fscrypt-enabled CephFS file(s) with a 4KiB-written/4KiB-skipped/repeat pattern (total filesize should not matter) and gradually increasing the system's memory pressure until a bounce buffer allocation fails.

Fix this crash by decrementing ceph_wbc->num_ops back to the correct value when move_dirty_folio_in_page_array() fails, but the folio already started counting a new (i.e. still-empty) extent.

The defect corrected by this patch has existed since 2022 (see first Fixes:), but another bug blocked multi-folio encrypted writeback until recently (see second Fixes:). The second commit made it into 6.18.16, 6.19.6, and 7.0-rc1, unmasking the panic in those versions. This patch therefore fixes a regression (panic) introduced by cac190c7674f.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

June 24, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 24, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba12c1e578890f6337a415b7dedf476c6d455105
generic

ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0d9555bf9eaeba34fe6b6bb86f442fe08ba3842
generic

ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6200f41d6fcf2ac7e24866431e381cbc914560e4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46066(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (160 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.4-1~bpo13+1 (131 versions)7.0.4-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 195 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-25 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-25 05:23 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-25 05:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-23 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-23 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-23 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-21 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-21 20:39 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-21 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-20 11:23 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-20 11:23 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-20 11:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-17 09:17 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-17 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-08-17 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-16 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-16 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-08-16 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-15 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-08-15 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-14 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-14 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-08-14 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-12 23:40 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-12 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-08-12 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-11 23:56 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-11 23:56 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-11 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-11 00:13 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-11 00:13 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-11 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-09 21:09 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-09 21:09 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-09 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-08-08 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-08 21:26 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-08 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-07 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-07 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-07 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-05 20:53 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-05 20:53 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-05 20:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-08-03 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-03 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-03 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-08-02 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-08-02 15:05 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-02 15:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-01 15:21 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-01 15:21 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-01 15:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-31 07:30 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-07-31 07:30 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-07-31 07:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-29 15:16 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-07-29 15:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-27 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-07-27 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46066?
CVE-2026-46066 is a medium vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails movedirtyfolioinpage_array() may fail if the file is encrypted, the dirty folio is not the first in the batch, and it fails to allocate a bounce buffer to hold the…
When was CVE-2026-46066 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46066 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026, with the most recent update on June 24, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46066 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46066 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46066?
CVE-2026-46066 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46066?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46066, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46066

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46066?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.