etcd is a distributed key-value store for the data of a distributed system. Prior to versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9, unauthorized users may bypass authentication or authorization checks and call certain etcd functions in clusters that expose the gRPC API to untrusted or partially trusted clients. In unpatched etcd clusters with etcd auth enabled, unauthorized users are able to call MemberList and learn cluster topology, including member IDs and advertised endpoints; call Alarm, which can be abused for operational disruption or denial of service; use Lease APIs, interfering with TTL-based keys and lease ownership; and/or trigger compaction, permanently removing historical revisions and disrupting watch, audit, and recovery workflows. Kubernetes does not rely on etcd’s built-in authentication and authorization. Instead, the API server handles authentication and authorization itself, so typical Kubernetes deployments are not affected. Versions 3.4.42, 3.5.28, and 3.6.9 contain a patch. If upgrading is not immediately possible, reduce exposure by treating the affected RPCs as unauthenticated in practice. Restrict network access to etcd server ports so only trusted components can connect and/or require strong client identity at the transport layer, such as mTLS with tightly scoped client certificate distribution.
CVE-2026-33413
This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8(low)
- EG Risk
- 55(Track)EG Risk 55/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity88% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 16%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 26, 2026
Last Modified
June 17, 2026
References (1)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/security/advisories/GHSA-q8m4-xhhv-38mg
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-33413(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:28047Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 (etcd) security update
- RHSA-2026:23345Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Multicluster Global Hub 1.6.2 security update
- RHSA-2026:22347Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Multicluster Global Hub 1.4.5 security update
- CVE-2026-33413Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)High
etcd: Authorization bypasses in multiple APIs
- RHSA-2026:21769Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Multicluster Global Hub 1.5.4 security update
Patch Availability(4)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | etcd-0:3.4.26-9.5.el9ost | 2026-06-22 | redhat |
| redhat | multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9:1780167118 | 2026-06-04 | redhat |
| redhat | multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9:1779579439 | 2026-06-01 | redhat |
| redhat | multicluster-globalhub/multicluster-globalhub-grafana-rhel9:1778867753 | 2026-05-28 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-27 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownredhat
- CVE-2001-0825EG 10.0HIGH
- CVE-2001-0554EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-0414EG 10.0EPSS p100HIGH
- CVE-2001-0191EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2001-0301EG 10.0EPSS p90HIGH
- CVE-2001-0197EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0233EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2001-0010EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2001-0011EG 10.0EPSS p94HIGH
- CVE-2001-0013EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-862
- CVE-2013-3960EG 9.9CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-10143EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-11036EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-11541EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2011-4183NVD 6.5EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-10251EG 9.8EPSS p90CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-1217EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2018-0015EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-12582EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2017-1000056EG 9.8CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-33413?
When was CVE-2026-33413 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-33413 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-33413?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-33413?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-33413
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-33413?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.