CVE-2026-33495

MEDIUMNVD 6.56.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 86% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
6.5
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS: 0%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: NoneExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

ORY Oathkeeper is an Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) and Access Control Decision API that authorizes HTTP requests based on sets of Access Rules. Ory Oathkeeper is often deployed behind other components like CDNs, WAFs, or reverse proxies. Depending on the setup, another component might forward the request to the Oathkeeper proxy with a different protocol (http vs. https) than the original request. In order to properly match the request against the configured rules, Oathkeeper considers the X-Forwarded-Proto header when evaluating rules. The configuration option serve.proxy.trust_forwarded_headers (defaults to false) governs whether this and other X-Forwarded-* headers should be trusted. Prior to version 26.2.0, Oathkeeper did not properly respect this configuration, and would always consider the X-Forwarded-Proto header. In order for an attacker to abuse this, an installation of Ory Oathkeeper needs to have distinct rules for HTTP and HTTPS requests. Also, the attacker needs to be able to trigger one but not the other rule. In this scenario, the attacker can send the same request but with the X-Forwarded-Proto header in order to trigger the other rule. We do not expect many configurations to meet these preconditions. Version 26.2.0 contains a patch. Ory Oathkeeper will correctly respect the serve.proxy.trust_forwarded_headers configuration going forward, thereby eliminating the attack scenario. We recommend upgrading to a fixed version even if the preconditions are not met. As an additional mitigation, it is generally recommended to drop any unexpected headers as early as possible when a request is handled, e.g. in the WAF.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5(medium)
EG Risk
44(Track)
EG Risk 44/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity65% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS
14.3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

March 26, 2026

Last Modified

April 2, 2026

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
github.com/ory/oathkeeper0.40.10-0.20260320084810-e9acca14a04d

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 101 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-23 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-17 05:24 UTCOSV refresh
  11. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-06-29 03:32 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-15 17:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-02 20:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-01 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-01 06:13 UTCOSV refresh
  55. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-05-28 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-27 13:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-26 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-26 07:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-05-20 22:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-20 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-05-20 11:22 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-33495?
CVE-2026-33495 is a medium vulnerability published on March 26, 2026. ORY Oathkeeper is an Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) and Access Control Decision API that authorizes HTTP requests based on sets of Access Rules. Ory Oathkeeper is often deployed behind other components like CDNs, WAFs, or reverse proxies. Depending on the setup, another component might forward the…
When was CVE-2026-33495 disclosed?
CVE-2026-33495 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on March 26, 2026, with the most recent update on April 2, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-33495 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-33495 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 14.3% percentile likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days — higher percentiles indicate greater predicted risk.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-33495?
CVE-2026-33495 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-33495?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-33495, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-33495

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-33495?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.